Mayflower Care Center

Name: Mayflower Care Center
Address: 5043 PECK RD, El Monte, CA, 91732, US
Telephone: 6265791602

5043 Peck Rd, El Monte, CA 91732 · Los Angeles County · 59 certified beds · avg 58 residents/day · certified since Jun 8, 1989

Part of chain: LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.60

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (40)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 22, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 14, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 14, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jun 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jun 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jun 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Jun 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Jun 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Dec 18, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Jul 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Jul 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jul 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jul 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jul 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 14, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide bedrooms with required basics: a window to the outside, a room at or above ground level, adequate bedding, furniture that fits the resident's needs, or enough closet space. · from a complaint
May 14, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Dec 16, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Dec 16, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 16, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 16, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 11).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2021	9	E
2024	17	E
2025	11	E
2026	3	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.60	4.31	3.95	top 24% in California; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.24	0.61	0.69	bottom 4% in California; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.14	3.90	3.50	top 26% in California; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.17	0.51	0.48	bottom 6% in California; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	35.9	36.7	45.8	top 49% in California; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	38.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.18, RN 0.22, weekend 3.76. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Friedman Family Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	20%	06/30/2023
Friedman, Aaron	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	20%	06/30/2023
Ira D Friedman 1991 Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	20%	06/30/2023
Klavan, Rachel	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	20%	06/30/2023
Lehmann Family 1991 Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	20%	06/30/2023
Lehmann, Libby	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	20%	06/30/2023
The Klavan Family Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	20%	06/30/2023
The Tzippy Friedman Notis 1990 Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	20%	06/30/2023
Aaron Friedman Group a Business Assets Trust	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/30/2023
Banog, Mary Faith	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/22/2025
Banog, Mary Faith	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/22/2025
Estandarte, Noel	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/12/2023
Estandarte, Noel	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/12/2023
FLT Acquisitions LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/30/2023
Friedman, Aaron	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/16/2026
Friedman, Aaron	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/30/2023
Friedman, Ira	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2015
Ira David Friedman Group a Business Assets Trust	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/30/2023
Klavan, Joshua	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2022
Klavan, Joshua	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/16/1986

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Santa Fe Lodge	0.0 mi	El Monte, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Gardens of el Monte	0.9 mi	El Monte, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Fidelity Health Care	1.1 mi	El Monte, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Temple City Healthcare	1.3 mi	Temple City, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Monrovia Gardens Healthcare Center	1.8 mi	Monrovia, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Penn Mar Healthcare Center	2.1 mi	El Monte, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Madera Post Acute Center	2.2 mi	El Monte, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Baldwin Gardens Nursing Center	2.3 mi	Temple City, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital	2.3 mi	Temple City, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Eastland Subacute and Rehabilitation Center	2.4 mi	El Monte, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Huntington Drive Health and Rehabilitation Center	2.8 mi	Arcadia, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Monrovia Post Acute	2.9 mi	Duarte, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in El Monte →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555374.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Mayflower Care Center

5043 Peck Rd, El Monte, CA 91732 · 6265791602

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555374 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)