South CarolinaHopkins

Sedgewood Manor Health Care Center

1645 Ridge Road, Hopkins, SC 29061 · Richland County · 38 certified beds · avg 29 residents/day · certified since May 17, 2000

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.83
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Jul 10, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Jul 10, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 10, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jul 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Jul 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Mar 11, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 11, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202220E
202460F
2025100F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 29, 2025Payment Denial85 days from Oct 29, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.834.083.95bottom 49% in South Carolina; top 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.670.69bottom 12% in South Carolina; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.323.553.50bottom 48% in South Carolina; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.410.48top 47% in South Carolina; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.045.945.8bottom 18% in South Carolina; bottom 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.042.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.84, RN 0.32, weekend 3.32. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Garrard, LouisIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Garrard, LouisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Garrard, LouisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Garrard, LouisIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Garrard, LouisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Maung, PeterIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Life Care Center of Columbia8.2 miColumbia, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Wildewood Downs8.9 miColumbia, SC★★★★★4/5
Midlands Health & Rehabilitation Center9.7 miColumbia, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
White Oak Manor - Columbia9.9 miColumbia, SC★★★★☆3/5
Forest Acres Post Acute9.9 miColumbia, SC★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pruitthealth- Columbia10.1 miColumbia, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
NHC Healthcare - Parklane10.5 miColumbia, SC★★★★★5/5
C M Tucker Jr Nursing Care Center Fewell and Stone11.3 miColumbia, SC★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
C M Tucker Jr Nursing Care Center Roddey Pavilio11.3 miColumbia, SC★★☆☆☆1/5
Pruitthealth- Blythewood11.8 miColumbia, SC★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hopkins →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425370.