How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
300 N Nebraska Ave., San Juan, TX 78589 (opens Google Maps) · Hidalgo County · (956) 787-1771· 114 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Mar 6, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. · from a complaint F-0659
The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. F-0637
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. · from a complaint · F-0659 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.33 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 9% in Texas; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 29% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.76 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 10% in Texas; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 15% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.1 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 34% in Texas; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 20% in Texas; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.35, RN 0.30, weekend 3.78.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.35 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for San Juan Nursing Home, INC.. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roman Catholic Diocese of Brownsville | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/1966 |
| Roman Catholic Diocese of Brownsville | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/1966 |
| Arcaute, Raquel | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2018 |
| Bermudez, Yuri | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2016 |
| Bermudez, Yuri | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2016 |
| Contreras, Alejandra | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2012 |
| Contreras, Alejandra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2012 |
| Dominguez, Natalia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/06/2025 |
| Dominguez, Natalia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/06/2025 |
| Flores, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2010 |
| Garza, Alma | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2013 |
| Garza, Javier | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2013 |
| Medina, Trinidad | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2013 |
| Munoz, Jaime | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2013 |
| Rigsby, Jan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/17/2022 |
| Roman Catholic Diocese of Brownsville | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1966 |
| Tamez, Carlos | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/17/2022 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Heights of Alamo | 2.7 mi | Alamo, TX | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Windsor Las Palmas Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent | 3.4 mi | McAllen, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| McAllen Transitional Care Center | 3.5 mi | McAllen, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| McAllen Nursing Center | 3.9 mi | McAllen, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Colonial Manor Advanced Rehab & Healthcare | 4.1 mi | Pharr, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Alfredo Gonzalez Texas State Veterans Home | 4.2 mi | McAllen, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Grand Terrace Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 4.6 mi | McAllen, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.8 mi | Edinburg, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of McAll | 4.9 mi | McAllen, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 5.3 mi | Edinburg, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Edinb | 6.6 mi | Edinburg, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 6.7 mi | McAllen, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hidalgo, TX — 22 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455484.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details