MaineRumford

Rumford Community Home

11 John F Kennedy Lane, Rumford, ME 04276 · Oxford County · 32 certified beds · avg 30 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1993

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.30
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 14, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 8, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Apr 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Apr 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Apr 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 14, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2025151G ▲
2026100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaine avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.304.603.95bottom 35% in Maine; top 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.111.110.69top 47% in Maine; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.084.163.50top 49% in Maine; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.010.730.48top 17% in Maine; top 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.146.745.8top 22% in Maine; top 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.040.242.9top 22% in Maine; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 1.04, weekend 3.84. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Central Maine Healthcare CorporationOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2000
Bodger, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2016
Bodger, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2016
Burrows, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2021
Burrows, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2025
Central Maine Healthcare CorporationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/27/2026
Culver, DevoreIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2026
Culver, DevoreIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2026
Doan, ChristopherIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2026
Doan, ChristopherIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2026
French, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2021
French, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2021
Hattan, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Hattan, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Paulosky, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2022
Paulosky, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2021
Pepin, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2026
Pepin, LindaIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2026
Shew, ElizabethIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2022
Shew, ElizabethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pinnacle Health & Rehab Canton13.2 miCanton, ME★★☆☆☆2/5
Maine Veterans Home - So Paris18.9 miSouth Paris, ME★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Rumford →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 205099.