MissouriColumbia

Columbia Manor Health & Rehabilitation

2012 Nifong Boulevard, Columbia, MO 65201 · Boone County · 52 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since May 1, 2004

Part of chain: MO OP HOLDCO, LLC (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Mar 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Apr 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 31, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
May 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
May 12, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340F
2024120F
202580F
202650D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.953.663.95bottom 22% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.490.69top 43% in Missouri; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.783.223.50bottom 30% in Missouri; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.330.48top 13% in Missouri; top 39% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)82.056.045.8bottom 3% in Missouri; bottom 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)70.047.842.9bottom 19% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.56, RN 0.39, weekend 2.41. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lichtenstein, EliIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2024
Lichtenstein, IsaacIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2024
Mandelbaum, ChaimIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2024
Mo Op Holdco, LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Barnes, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Barnes, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Kramer, ShmuelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Kramer, ShmuelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Lichtenstein, EliIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Lichtenstein, EliIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Lichtenstein, EliIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2024
Lichtenstein, IsaacIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2024
Mandelbaum, ChaimIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Mandelbaum, ChaimIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Wells, TinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2025
Wells, TinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bluffs, the0.8 miColumbia, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lenoir Health Care Center1.0 miColumbia, MO★★★★★5/5
Neighborhoods Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing B1.0 miColumbia, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
South Hampton Rehabilitation & Health Care Center1.9 miColumbia, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Columbia Post Acute3.7 miColumbia, MO★★★★★5/5
Parkside Manor4.9 miColumbia, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Villa at Blue Ridge, the5.3 miColumbia, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Kingdom Care Senior Living19.9 miFulton, MO★★★★☆3/5
Fulton Nursing & Rehab20.0 miFulton, MO★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Columbia →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265778.