How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Regent Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare
10604 East 13th Street N, Wichita, KS 67206 (opens Google Maps) · Sedgwick County · (316) 337-5450· 84 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Jun 22, 2012 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 11, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. F-0552
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. F-0688
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint · F-0757 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint · F-0849 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint · F-0919 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint · F-0732 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityKansas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.86
Kansas average: 4.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.99
Kansas average: 0.81
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.12
Kansas average: 4.05
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.86 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 35% in Kansas; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.99 | 0.81 | 0.69 | top 24% in Kansas; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.12 | 4.05 | 3.50 | top 42% in Kansas; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 30% in Kansas; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.9 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 47% in Kansas; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 42.0 | 42.9 | bottom 40% in Kansas; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.70, RN 0.96, weekend 3.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.70 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Regent Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brooks, Philip | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/16/2012 |
| Buchanan, Timothy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/16/2012 |
| Legend Senior Properties | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/16/2012 |
| R Park Associates LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/16/2012 |
| Warren, Brian | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/16/2012 |
| Brooks, Philip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2012 |
| Buchanan, Timothy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2012 |
| Foundation Properties Corporation | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2012 |
| Savute, Katie | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Warren, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2012 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 49% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 31 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center at Waterfront LLC | 0.2 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avita Health and Rehab at Reeds Cove | 1.8 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Great Plains Post Acute | 2.4 mi | Wichita, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Larksfield Place | 2.8 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Wichita | 3.1 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Horizon Post Acute | 3.5 mi | Wichita, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Caritas Center, INC | 3.7 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Orchard Gardens | 4.0 mi | Wichita, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Andover | 4.2 mi | Andover, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Catholic Care Center, INC | 4.7 mi | Bel Aire, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lincoln Care and Rehab | 4.7 mi | Wichita, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mount St Mary | 4.9 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Sedgwick, KS — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Rolling Hills Health and Rehab — Wichita, KS · overall 3/5
- Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center — Wichita, KS · overall 4/5
- Via Christi Village Ridge — Wichita, KS · overall 4/5abuse
- Westview of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care Cen — Derby, KS · overall 2/5
- Wichita Presbyterian Manor — Wichita, KS · overall 5/5
- Ascension Living via Christi Village McLean — Wichita, KS · overall 5/5
- Azria Health Wichita — Wichita, KS · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175527.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).