How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
12200 Broadbent, Lansing, MI 48917 (opens Google Maps) · Eaton County · (517) 731-6200· 120 certified beds · avg 107 residents/day · certified since Sep 2, 2015 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE (81 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 20, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 15, 2023 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 7, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
| Oct 31, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578 |
| May 15, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| May 15, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| May 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · F-0710 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 15, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 15 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.50 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 9% in Michigan; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.69 | top 28% in Michigan; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.12 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 12% in Michigan; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 34% in Michigan; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.3 | 44.1 | 45.8 | top 48% in Michigan; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.3 | 39.2 | 42.9 | top 21% in Michigan; top 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.74, RN 1.05, weekend 3.34.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.74 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Regency at Lansing West. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohammad a Qazi Living Trust Dated 09/26/97 | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Amlog, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Amlog, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Brzak, Matthew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2022 |
| Brzak, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2025 |
| Ciena Healthcare Management INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Ciena Healthcare Management INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2025 |
| Eaton Senior Leasing, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Khan, Anis | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Khan, Anis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Khan, Anis | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Mohammad a Qazi Living Trust Dated 09/26/97 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2015 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ciena Healthcare/Laurel Health Care — 81 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 80 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medilodge of Lansing | 1.4 mi | Lansing, MI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aria Nursing and Rehabilitation | 8.3 mi | Lansing, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Dimondale Nursing Care Center | 8.7 mi | Dimondale, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Medilodge of Capital Area | 8.7 mi | Lansing, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Holt Senior Care and Rehab Center | 9.0 mi | Holt, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Willows at East Lansing | 9.2 mi | East Lansing, MI | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Medilodge of East Lansing | 11.1 mi | East Lansing, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Medilodge of Campus Area | 11.6 mi | East Lansing, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Burcham Hills Retirement Center | 11.8 mi | East Lansing, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Medilodge of Okemos | 13.7 mi | Okemos, MI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Willows at Okemos | 13.8 mi | Okemos, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Eaton County Medical Care Facility | 14.0 mi | Charlotte, MI | ★★★★★ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235706.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details