South CarolinaAiken

Pruitthealth- Aiken

830 Laurens Street North, Aiken, SC 29801 · Aiken County · 176 certified beds · avg 160 residents/day · certified since Apr 6, 1982

Part of chain: PRUITTHEALTH (95 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$14,069
Fines, last 3 years
3.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 19, 2025 · F-0678

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 30, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 19, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Dec 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Dec 19, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Dec 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Dec 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Jun 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230E
202480F
202551J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,069.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 19, 2025Fine$14,069

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.624.083.95bottom 34% in South Carolina; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.560.670.69top 50% in South Carolina; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.763.553.50bottom 10% in South Carolina; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.410.48top 43% in South Carolina; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.845.945.8top 18% in South Carolina; top 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)45.042.142.9bottom 42% in South Carolina; bottom 44% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.33, RN 0.52, weekend 2.54. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lisa P Hamby TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2003
Neil L Pruitt Jr TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2003
NWP 2020 Child Tr Fbo Neil L Pruitt JrOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/14/2025
Pruitt, NeilIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2007
Pruitt, NeilIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2007
United Health Services INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/27/2013
United Health Services of South Carolina INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/27/2013
Hoang, DustinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2021
Hoang, DustinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/13/2025
J Paige Pruitt TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2003
Lisa P Hamby TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2003
McCullough, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
McCullough, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2025
Neil L Pruitt Jr TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2003
Pruitt, NancyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/27/2013
Pruitt, NeilIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/27/2013
Pruitthealth Consulting Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/26/2013
Small, PhilipIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/27/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Carlyle Senior Care of Aiken0.6 miAiken, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Aiken Rehabilitation and Care Center2.4 miAiken, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Anchor Post Acute4.8 miAiken, SC★☆☆☆☆2/5
NHC Healthcare - North Augusta12.8 miNorth Augusta, SC★★★★☆4/5
Pruitthealth- North Augusta14.1 miNorth Augusta, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Pruitthealth - Augusta Hills17.9 miAugusta, GA★★★★☆4/5
Edgefield Post-Acute18.4 miEdgefield, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Azalea Health Center by Harborview18.8 miAugusta, GA★★☆☆☆2/5
Stevens Park Health and Rehabilitation19.3 miAugusta, GA★★★★★4/5
Pruitthealth - Augusta19.3 miAugusta, GA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Pruitthealth - Creekside19.6 miAugusta, GA★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Aiken →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425145.