South CarolinaAiken

Carlyle Senior Care of Aiken

123 Dupont Dr Northeast, Aiken, SC 29801 · Aiken County · 86 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1980

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CARLYLE SENIOR CARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 21, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 3, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 15, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

All citations in the current public record (11)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 21, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 15, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Aug 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Oct 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202210D
202310D
202410D
202571J ▲
202611J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.804.083.95top 15% in South Carolina; top 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.430.670.69bottom 28% in South Carolina; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.413.553.50top 14% in South Carolina; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.330.410.48bottom 50% in South Carolina; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.345.945.8top 46% in South Carolina; top 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.342.142.9top 38% in South Carolina; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.10, RN 0.37, weekend 3.78. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
New Day Health Ventures, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2016
Fowler, Wanda MIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/31/2022
Moore, JohnIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pruitthealth- Aiken0.6 miAiken, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Aiken Rehabilitation and Care Center3.0 miAiken, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Anchor Post Acute4.8 miAiken, SC★☆☆☆☆2/5
NHC Healthcare - North Augusta13.3 miNorth Augusta, SC★★★★☆4/5
Pruitthealth- North Augusta14.7 miNorth Augusta, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Pruitthealth - Augusta Hills18.5 miAugusta, GA★★★★☆4/5
Edgefield Post-Acute18.7 miEdgefield, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Azalea Health Center by Harborview19.3 miAugusta, GA★★☆☆☆2/5
Pruitthealth - Augusta19.8 miAugusta, GA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Stevens Park Health and Rehabilitation19.9 miAugusta, GA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Aiken →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425014.