How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Prairie Manor Nrsg & Rehab Ctr
345 Dixie Highway, Chicago Heights, IL 60411 (opens Google Maps) · Cook County · (708) 754-7601· 148 certified beds · avg 130 residents/day · certified since Apr 5, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 12, 2024
5
Serious findings on record
most recent Sep 12, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 12, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 12, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 16, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 22, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 22, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 28, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 25, 2022 · F-0550
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 25, 2022 · F-0550
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 8, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 25, 2022 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 25, 2022 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 8, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 25, 2022 · F-0637
The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 25, 2022 · F-0637
The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Why it matters: Without a fresh assessment, a resident's care may not keep up with their changing health needs.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 8, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Dec 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Apr 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Sep 12, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Aug 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases. · F-0885 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Aug 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 3
2023
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 12 | 3 | G ▲ |
| 2023 | 11 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 3 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityIllinois averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.54
Illinois average: 2.99
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.34
Illinois average: 0.63
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.27
Illinois average: 2.67
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Illinois avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.54 | 2.99 | 3.95 | bottom 39% in Illinois; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.34 | 0.63 | 0.69 | bottom 23% in Illinois; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.27 | 2.67 | 3.50 | bottom 40% in Illinois; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.33 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 27% in Illinois; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 37% in Illinois; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 35.7 | 41.8 | 42.9 | top 41% in Illinois; top 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.26, RN 0.44, weekend 2.91.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.26 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Prairie Manor Nrsg & Rehab Ctr. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams Vales Accumulation Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 01/01/2013 |
| Daniel Rothner Accumulation Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 09/01/2013 |
| Kathryn Vales Accumulation Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 01/01/2013 |
| Kimberly Vales Accumulation Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 01/01/2013 |
| Melissa Rothner Accumulation Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 01/01/2013 |
| Nathan and Shirley Rothner Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 22% | 01/01/2013 |
| Rachel Rothner Accumulation Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 01/01/2013 |
| William Rothner Accumulation Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 11% | 01/01/2013 |
| Adams Vales Accumulation Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Adams Vales Accumulation Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Aronin, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Daniel Rothner Accumulation Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2013 |
| Daniel Rothner Accumulation Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2025 |
| Extended Care Clinical LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Extended Care Consulting LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Israel, Levi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Joshi, Sanjeev | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Joshi, Sanjeev | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Kathryn Vales Accumulation Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Kathryn Vales Accumulation Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2025 |
Showing 20 of 38 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 18 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Extended Care Clinical — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Renwick Nursing and Rehab — Joliet, IL · overall 1/5
- South Shore Rehabilitation — Chicago, IL · overall 1/5
- St James Wellness Rehab Villas — Crete, IL · overall 2/5
- Beecher Manor Nrsg & Rehab Ctr — Beecher, IL · overall 2/5
- Chateau Nrsg & Rehab Center — Willowbrook, IL · overall 2/5
- Countryside Nursing & Rehab Ctr — Dolton, IL · overall 1/5
- Lakewood Nrsg & Rehab Center — Plainfield, IL · overall 3/5
- Lemont Nursing & Rehab Center — Lemont, IL · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Illinois midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 38 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 81 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryze at Homewood | 1.6 mi | Homewood, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Aperion Care Chicago Heights | 1.7 mi | Chicago Heights, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Bria of Chicago Heights | 2.4 mi | South Chicago Height, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Aliya of Homewood | 3.0 mi | Homewood, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aliya of Glenwood | 3.1 mi | Glenwood, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Generations at Applewood | 3.8 mi | Matteson, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pine Crest Health Care | 3.9 mi | Hazel Crest, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Elevate Care Country Club Hill | 4.7 mi | Country Club Hills, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Landmark of Richton Park Rehab & Nsg Ctr | 5.4 mi | Richton Park, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Heather Health Care Center | 5.6 mi | Harvey, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Elevate Care South Holland | 5.7 mi | South Holland, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Prairie Oasis | 5.9 mi | South Holland, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Cook, IL — 202 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Princeton Rehab & HCC — Chicago, IL · overall 1/5abuse
- Rivaya Care of Des Plaines — Des Plaines, IL · overall 1/5
- Ryze at the Ridge — Chicago, IL · overall 1/5
- Ryze on the Avenue — Chicago, IL · overall 1/5abuse
- Ryze West — Chicago, IL · overall 2/5
- Selfhelp Home of Chicago — Chicago, IL · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145629.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).