IllinoisChicago Heights

Prairie Manor Nrsg & Rehab Ctr

345 Dixie Highway, Chicago Heights, IL 60411 · Cook County · 148 certified beds · avg 130 residents/day · certified since Apr 5, 1989

Part of chain: EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 12, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 16, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 22, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 28, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 25, 2022 · F-0550

The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 8, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 25, 2022 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 8, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 25, 2022 · F-0637

The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.

Why it matters: Without a fresh assessment, a resident's care may not keep up with their changing health needs.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 8, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Aug 22, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 25, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 25, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Aug 25, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Aug 25, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 25, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 25, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases.
Aug 25, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff.
Aug 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Aug 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022123G ▲
2023111G ▲
202431G ▲
202540E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.542.993.95bottom 39% in Illinois; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.340.630.69bottom 23% in Illinois; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.272.673.50bottom 40% in Illinois; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.330.560.48bottom 27% in Illinois; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.744.545.8top 37% in Illinois; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.741.842.9top 41% in Illinois; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.26, RN 0.44, weekend 2.91. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Adams Vales Accumulation TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%01/01/2013
Daniel Rothner Accumulation TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%09/01/2013
Kathryn Vales Accumulation TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%01/01/2013
Kimberly Vales Accumulation TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%01/01/2013
Melissa Rothner Accumulation TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%01/01/2013
Nathan and Shirley Rothner Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest22%01/01/2013
Rachel Rothner Accumulation TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%01/01/2013
William Rothner Accumulation TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11%01/01/2013
Adams Vales Accumulation TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Adams Vales Accumulation TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Aronin, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Daniel Rothner Accumulation TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2013
Daniel Rothner Accumulation TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Extended Care Clinical LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Extended Care Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Israel, LeviIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Joshi, SanjeevIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Joshi, SanjeevIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Kathryn Vales Accumulation TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Kathryn Vales Accumulation TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Ryze at Homewood1.6 miHomewood, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Aperion Care Chicago Heights1.7 miChicago Heights, IL★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Bria of Chicago Heights2.4 miSouth Chicago Height, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Aliya of Homewood3.0 miHomewood, IL★★☆☆☆3/5
Aliya of Glenwood3.1 miGlenwood, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Generations at Applewood3.8 miMatteson, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pine Crest Health Care3.9 miHazel Crest, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Elevate Care Country Club Hill4.7 miCountry Club Hills, IL★★☆☆☆2/5
Landmark of Richton Park Rehab & Nsg Ctr5.4 miRichton Park, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Heather Health Care Center5.6 miHarvey, IL★★☆☆☆1/5
Elevate Care South Holland5.7 miSouth Holland, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Prairie Oasis5.9 miSouth Holland, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chicago Heights →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145629.