How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Parkview Care Center
3105 W Arkansas Ave, Denver, CO 80219 (opens Google Maps) · Denver County · (303) 936-3497· 73 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Feb 17, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LONG PEAK OPERATING COMPANY (8 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 21, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.42
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 21, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 21, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jan 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityColorado averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.42
Colorado average: 3.89
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.87
Colorado average: 0.86
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.00
Colorado average: 3.44
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Colorado avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.42 | 3.89 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Colorado; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.69 | top 40% in Colorado; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.00 | 3.44 | 3.50 | bottom 30% in Colorado; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.48 | top 35% in Colorado; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 49.1 | 47.1 | 45.8 | bottom 43% in Colorado; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 54.5 | 44.6 | 42.9 | bottom 29% in Colorado; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.46, RN 0.88, weekend 3.04.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.46 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Parkview Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Peak Opco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Parkview SNF Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2024 |
| Beecan Health Co LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Dergance, Jeannae | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Haskell, Cynthia | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Haskell, Cynthia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Koretke, Mary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Koretke, Mary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Moskowitz, Jay | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Moskowitz, Jay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Raskin, Chaim | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Raskin, Chaim | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Ray, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Ray, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2025 |
| Valle, Karla | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Valle, Karla | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Long Peak Operating Company — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Thornton Care Center — Thornton, CO · overall 1/5
- University Heights Care Center — Aurora, CO · overall 3/5abuse
- Allison Care Center — Lakewood, CO · overall 2/5abuse
- Arbor View Care Center, LLC — Arvada, CO · overall 3/5
- Crestmoor Care Center — Denver, CO · overall 3/5abuse
- Devonshire Care Center — Sterling, CO · overall 2/5
- Harmony Pointe Care Center — Lakewood, CO · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Colorado midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 49% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 16 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 82 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westwood Post Acute | 0.0 mi | Denver, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Oakwood Care and Rehabilitation | 2.2 mi | Lakewood, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Heights Care & Rehabilitation LLC | 2.3 mi | Denver, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mapleton Post Acute | 2.5 mi | Lakewood, CO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Villa Manor Care Center | 3.2 mi | Lakewood, CO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lakewood Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 3.5 mi | Lakewood, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sloan's Lake Rehabilitation Center | 3.5 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sierra Post Acute | 3.7 mi | Lakewood, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Englewood Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 3.8 mi | Englewood, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hallmark Nursing Center | 3.8 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Cedars Healthcare Center | 3.9 mi | Lakewood, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wellsprings Care Center | 3.9 mi | Englewood, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Denver, CO — 23 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Rowan Community, INC — Denver, CO · overall 4/5
- South Valley Post Acute Rehabilitation — Denver, CO · overall 4/5
- Suites at Clermont Park Care Center, the — Denver, CO · overall 5/5
- Uptown Care Center — Denver, CO · overall 4/5abuse
- Amberwood Post Acute — Denver, CO · overall 2/5
- Berkley Manor Care Center — Denver, CO · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065299.