Georgia ›Pulaski

Orchard Health and Rehabilitation

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1321 Pulaski School Road, Pulaski, GA 30451 (opens Google Maps) · Candler County · (912) 685-5072· 89 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

What the abuse flag means →

Part of chain: ETHICA HEALTH (50 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 3, 2025
4
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 3, 2025
$57,161
Fines, last 3 years
4.06
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 3, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 3, 2025 · F-0740 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.

Why it matters: A resident's untreated mental health needs can worsen and take a toll on their physical health too.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 3, 2025 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Apr 3, 2025 · F-0867 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Why it matters: Without a working quality program, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 7 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated

    The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600

  2. J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated

    The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint F-0740

  3. J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated

    The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint F-0835

View all 7 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Apr 3, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint · F-0740
Apr 3, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835
Apr 3, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint · F-0867
Jul 15, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Jul 15, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600
Jul 15, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed. · F-0914

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 4

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130D
202544J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $57,161.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 3, 2025Fine$57,161

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityGeorgia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.06
Georgia average: 3.54
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.39
Georgia average: 0.50
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.51
Georgia average: 3.09
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityGeorgia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.063.543.95top 15% in Georgia; top 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.390.500.69bottom 42% in Georgia; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.513.093.50top 17% in Georgia; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.350.48top 34% in Georgia; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.046.045.8top 9% in Georgia; top 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.044.542.9top 27% in Georgia; top 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.74, RN 0.36, weekend 3.24.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.74 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Orchard Health and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Other

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Health Scholarships INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2025
Cable, PaulIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2003
Clinical Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2006
Clinical Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/14/2025
Dennis, KathrynIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/17/2015
Jones, MaggieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/05/2026
Nelson, TraceyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/29/2026
Nelson, TraceyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/29/2026
Nichols, JosephIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Patel, MaulikkumarIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Patel, MaulikkumarIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Peavy, TiffanyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2026
Peavy, TiffanyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2026
Rollins, RonnieIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2003
Sheffield, KimberlyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2026
Wall, JosephIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2003
Warnock, RalphIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/23/2020

All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Ethica Health — 50 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 49 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
  • "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
  • "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
  • "How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"
  • "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
  • "How do you ensure privacy for residents in shared rooms during dressing and personal care?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pleasant View Nursing Center5.4 miMetter, GA★☆☆☆☆3/5
Azalea Health and Rehabilitation6.1 miMetter, GA★★★☆☆3/5
Westwood Healthcare and Rehabilitation10.6 miStatesboro, GA★★☆☆☆3/5
Eagle Health & Rehabilitation10.7 miStatesboro, GA★★★☆☆4/5
Brown's Health and Rehabilitation10.9 miStatesboro, GA★★★☆☆4/5
Heritage Inn Health and Rehabilitation12.3 miStatesboro, GA★★★★☆4/5
Camellia Health & Rehabilitation16.0 miClaxton, GA★★★☆☆3/5
Twin City Trails of Journey LLC17.7 miTwin City, GA★★★☆☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pulaski →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115522.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details