MichiganSaginaw

Optalis Health and Rehabilitation at St. Francis

915 North River Road, Saginaw, MI 48609 · Saginaw County · 94 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1975

Part of chain: OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$131,073
Fines, last 3 years
3.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 9, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 30, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 17, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 23, 2025 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 18, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (41)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 9, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Feb 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint
Jul 17, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Jan 23, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint
Jan 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Dec 30, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024161G ▲
2025122G ▲
2026131J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $131,073, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 17, 2025Fine$58,403
Dec 30, 2024Fine$72,670
Dec 30, 2024Payment Denial22 days from Feb 20, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.054.323.95bottom 1% in Michigan; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.230.840.69bottom 2% in Michigan; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.733.793.50bottom 2% in Michigan; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.180.490.48bottom 8% in Michigan; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.444.145.8bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.039.242.9bottom 17% in Michigan; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.04, RN 0.23, weekend 2.72. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Om Holdco 6 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/01/2024
Paar 108-GR LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2024
Pinal R Patel 2017 Irrv Tr Uad 6-14-17Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2024
Pinal R Patel Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2024
Rajan G Patel Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2024
Addo, AkuaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Addo, AkuaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2024
Khan, MuhammadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Khan, MuhammadIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2024
Om Holdco 6 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Optalis Saginaw Propco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2024
Optum Management Solutions. INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2024
Optum Management Solutions. INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2024
Paar 108 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Paar 108-GR LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Patel, RajanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Patel, RajanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Pinal R Patel 2017 Irrv Tr Uad 6-14-17OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Pinal R Patel Revocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024
Rajan G Patel Revocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Covenant Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation at Wel2.2 miSaginaw, MI★★★★☆3/5
Healthsource Saginaw, INC2.4 miSaginaw, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Saginaw Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center, LLC3.3 miSaginaw, MI★★★★☆3/5
Adira Nursing and Rehabilitation3.5 miSaginaw, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Great Lakes Rehabilitation Center4.8 miSaginaw, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Hoyt Nursing & Rehab Centre5.0 miSaginaw, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Avista Nursing and Rehabilitation8.3 miSaginaw, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Caretel Inns of Tri-Cities9.9 miBay City, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Carriage House Nursing and Rehabilitation13.4 miBay City, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center14.0 miBay City, MI★★★★☆3/5
Hampton Nursing and Rehabilitation14.4 miBay City, MI★★★★☆4/5
Stratford Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Center14.7 miMidland, MI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saginaw →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235249.