How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1212 Indian Hills Drive, Burlington, IA 52601 (opens Google Maps) · Des Moines County · (319) 752-4100· 60 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Jul 20, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jul 17, 2024 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. F-0883
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jun 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jun 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 31, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Jan 31, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| May 5, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| May 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| May 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| May 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 8 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Iowa avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.40 | 4.37 | 3.95 | top 44% in Iowa; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.69 | top 46% in Iowa; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.65 | 3.86 | 3.50 | bottom 45% in Iowa; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 4% in Iowa; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 54.4 | 44.0 | 45.8 | bottom 22% in Iowa; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 14.3 | 42.1 | 42.9 | top 11% in Iowa; top 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.64, RN 0.68, weekend 3.02.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.64 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Oakview Nursing and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arp Sample, Susan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2015 |
| Baumhoefener, John | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2015 |
| Dancer, Julie | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/19/2024 |
| Larson, Edgar | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2015 |
| Pietrzak, Michael | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2015 |
| Pruett, John | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2015 |
| Royer, Kevin | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/13/2023 |
| Showers, Joseph | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2015 |
| The Views Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2016 |
| Cambridge Realty Capital LTD of Illinois | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2015 |
| Cambridge Realty Capital LTD of Illinois | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2015 |
| Darnall, Hallie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/05/2025 |
| Darnall, Hallie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/05/2025 |
| Enzeroth, Kim | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Enzeroth, Kim | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Larison, Audra | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/17/2023 |
| Larison, Audra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/17/2023 |
| Pruett, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2010 |
| Pruett, John | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2006 |
| Rashid, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southeast Iowa Regional Medical - Klein Center | 0.7 mi | West Burlington, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Henderson County Ret Center | 13.8 mi | Stronghurst, IL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Azria Health Prairie Ridge | 14.3 mi | Mediapolis, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| New London Specialty Care | 15.1 mi | New London, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| West Point Care Center INC | 15.8 mi | West Point, IA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Birkwood Village of Fort Madison | 15.8 mi | Fort Madison, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wapello Specialty Care | 19.1 mi | Wapello, IA | ★★★★★ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165439.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details