TennesseeLewisburg

NHC Healthcare, Lewisburg

1653 Mooresville Highway, Lewisburg, TN 37091 · Marshall County · 100 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 1971

Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION (69 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$217,240
Fines, last 3 years
3.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 14, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 14, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 14, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 14, 2024 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 14, 2024 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 14, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 1, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 1, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Feb 1, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 1, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 1, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 1, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 1, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202080E
202495J ▲
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $217,240, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 14, 2024Fine$217,240
Mar 14, 2024Payment Denial36 days from Mar 20, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTennessee avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.863.623.95top 28% in Tennessee; top 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.650.570.69top 28% in Tennessee; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.423.153.50top 22% in Tennessee; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.470.390.48top 27% in Tennessee; top 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.848.945.8bottom 40% in Tennessee; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.043.242.9bottom 37% in Tennessee; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.01, RN 0.67, weekend 3.55. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Morgan Stanley Institutional Advisors LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2024
Nhc/Delaware INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2000
Bidwell, CharlesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/15/2021
Bidwell, CharlesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/15/2021
Bidwell, CharlesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/15/2021
Blackrock INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2010
Dodson, VickiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019
Dodson, VickiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019
Jefferson, KelleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Jefferson, KelleyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Jewell, MaggieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/28/2024
Kidd, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Kidd, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
National Health CorporationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
National Healthcare CorporationOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2000
National Healthcare CorporationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Nhc-Op LPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2000
Scott, DerrickIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2014
Scott, DerrickIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Shelly, TimothyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/12/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
NHC Healthcare, Oakwood0.5 miLewisburg, TN★★★★☆3/5
Magnolia Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center17.6 miColumbia, TN★★☆☆☆3/5
Life Care Center of Columbia17.9 miColumbia, TN★★★★☆4/5
NHC Healthcare, Columbia18.0 miColumbia, TN★★★★☆3/5
Nhc-Maury Regional Transitional Care Center18.4 miColumbia, TN★★★★★5/5
The Waters of Shelbyville, LLC19.6 miShelbyville, TN★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lewisburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445094.