Maple Springs Senior Living
350 East 2200 North, North Logan, UT 84341 · Cache County · 98 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Apr 14, 2017
Part of chain: MAPLE SPRINGS LIVING (3 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 8, 2025 · F-0805 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Why it matters: Food served in the wrong texture can cause choking or lead residents to stop eating and lose weight.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Dec 3, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (22)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint |
| Nov 16, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep complete, dated laboratory records in residents' files. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| Jan 13, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. |
| Jan 13, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 5).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $8,278.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2025 | Fine | $8,278 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Utah avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.76 | 3.87 | 3.95 | top 9% in Utah; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.46 | 1.17 | 0.69 | top 19% in Utah; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.39 | 3.39 | 3.50 | top 7% in Utah; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.98 | 0.88 | 0.48 | top 28% in Utah; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 0.0 | 50.7 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 40.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.88, RN 1.49, weekend 5.50. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronshield LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 04/14/2017 |
| Dunn, Elizabeth | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 04/14/2017 |
| Dunn, Marc | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2016 |
| Larsen, Gregory | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2016 |
| Larsen, Nicholas | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2016 |
| Morpheus Universe | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 04/14/2017 |
| Pistis Mercury | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 04/14/2017 |
| Dunn, Marc | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Dunn, Marc | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2017 |
| Larsen, Gregory | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Larsen, Nicholas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Larsen, Nicholas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Larsen, Nicholas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2017 |
| Path Accounting LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2017 |
| Pistis Mercury | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/2026 |
| Porter, Brett | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Porter, Brett | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Porter, Brett | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Tarbet, Jessica | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Tarbet, Jessica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you handle residents who need modified food textures, and how do you make those meals appetizing?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Under what circumstances would you discharge or transfer a resident, and what notice and appeal rights would we have?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocky Mountain Care - Logan | 0.9 mi | Logan, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Logan Regional Hospital Transitional Care Unit | 1.0 mi | Logan, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sunshine Terrace Skilled Nursing | 2.6 mi | Logan, UT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare Brigham City | 19.6 mi | Brigham City, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in North Logan →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465186.