UtahLogan

Rocky Mountain Care - Logan

1480 North 400 East, Logan, UT 84341 · Cache County · 120 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1988

Part of chain: ROCKY MOUNTAIN CARE (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.20
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 12, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 4, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 12, 2026 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 4, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 12, 2026 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 4, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 12, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
May 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 15, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 15, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Sep 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202240E
202490E
2026113G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityUtah avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.203.873.95bottom 21% in Utah; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.991.170.69bottom 49% in Utah; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.793.393.50bottom 21% in Utah; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.700.880.48bottom 47% in Utah; top 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)56.850.745.8bottom 33% in Utah; bottom 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)29.440.642.9top 32% in Utah; top 28% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.36, RN 1.04, weekend 2.93. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Beaver City CorporationOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/01/2015
Rmce Operations LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2026
Bangerte, NathanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2025
Bangerter, EdwardIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2025
Bangerter, JohnathanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2025
Barney, JanettIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Brown, GaryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Carlson, VeraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Carlson, VeraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Darby, MeganIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2025
Gatherum, JasonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2025
Hansen, KentIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/12/2025
Langford, ScottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Moss, TylerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Nelson, TristaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2025
Nelson, TristaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2025
Neves, CourtneyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2025
Oakden, RichardIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Owens, JonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/12/2025
Rmce Logan SNF Oc LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Logan Regional Hospital Transitional Care Unit0.2 miLogan, UT★★★★★5/5
Maple Springs Senior Living0.9 miNorth Logan, UT★★★☆☆3/5
Sunshine Terrace Skilled Nursing1.8 miLogan, UT★☆☆☆☆1/5
Monument Healthcare Brigham City18.9 miBrigham City, UT★★☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Logan →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465116.