Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP (126 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 11, 2026
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Oct 18, 2024
$77,272
Fines, last 3 years
3.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 18, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 17, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 6, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. F-0627
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
Date
Severity
What the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Jun 11, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · F-0627
Jun 11, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jun 11, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Jun 11, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Jun 11, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790
Aug 28, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838
Aug 28, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. · F-0940
Aug 28, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · F-0627
Aug 28, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Aug 28, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Oct 18, 2024
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
Oct 18, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Oct 18, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Oct 18, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699
Oct 18, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Jan 17, 2024
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
Jan 17, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Jan 17, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).
Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations:
8
Serious citations (G–L):
2
2025
All citations:
5
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2026
All citations:
6
Serious citations (G–L):
0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Year
Citations
Serious (G–L)
Worst severity that year
2024
8
2
G ▲
2025
5
0
E
2026
6
0
D
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
Date
Type
Amount / length
Oct 18, 2024
Fine
$62,790
Nov 9, 2023
Fine
$14,482
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility:
3.05
Pennsylvania average:
3.94
U.S. average:
3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility:
0.75
Pennsylvania average:
0.80
U.S. average:
0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility:
2.72
Pennsylvania average:
3.58
U.S. average:
3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Measure
This facility
Pennsylvania avg
U.S. avg
Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
3.05
3.94
3.95
bottom 14% in Pennsylvania; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours
0.75
0.80
0.69
top 38% in Pennsylvania; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing
2.72
3.58
3.50
bottom 11% in Pennsylvania; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)
0.61
0.56
0.48
top 30% in Pennsylvania; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)
22.2
44.5
45.8
top 5% in Pennsylvania; top 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)
36.4
39.9
42.9
top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 40% in the U.S.
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.60, RN 0.89, weekend 3.20.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.60 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mid-Valley Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Benjamin N. Volpe Family Dynasty Trust (dated December 29, 2020)
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
BNV Dynasty LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
Cibc Bank USA
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
02/29/2024
Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
07/04/2024
Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
Dodge, Nicholas
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/18/2016
Jones, Lisa
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
11/10/2014
Jones, Lisa
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
11/10/2014
Mid-Valley SNF Healthcare LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/01/2024
Nicoluzakis, Gregory
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
03/01/2019
Nicoluzakis, Gregory
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/01/2019
RKL LLP
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
07/01/2023
Saber Governance LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
09/01/2019
Saber Healthcare Group LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
07/01/2024
Sakalas, Lori
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
05/06/2024
Sakalas, Lori
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
05/06/2024
SHG Management LLC
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
09/01/2019
SHG Management LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
09/01/2019
Volpe, Benjamin
Individual
Corporate Director
NOT APPLICABLE
03/01/2019
Volpe, Benjamin
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
03/01/2019
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Saber Healthcare Group — 126 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
CMS records place this facility in Lackawanna, PA — 16 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395644.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
The Care File
Visit checklist — Mid-Valley Health Care Center
81 Sturges Road, Peckville, PA 18452 · (570) 383-7320
Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $77,272
Most serious findings on record:
▲ Oct 18, 2024 (F-0686, Actual harm, isolated): The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Jan 17, 2024 (F-0686, Actual harm, isolated): The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Questions for the administrator:
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
☐ "Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
☐ "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
☐ "How do residents get routine dental care, and what happens if someone has a dental emergency at night?"
☐ "How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
☐ "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 22% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "The ownership record on file lists 26 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
While you're there, notice:
☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)
Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 395644 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)