Mission at Community Living Rehabilitation Center

Name: Mission at Community Living Rehabilitation Center
Address: 10 West 400 South, Centerfield, UT, 84622, US
Telephone: 4355282800

10 West 400 South, Centerfield, UT 84622 · Sanpete County · 46 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since Dec 20, 2010

Part of chain: MISSION HEALTH SERVICES (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.08

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 25, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep complete, dated laboratory records in residents' files. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 12, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
Sep 12, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Sep 12, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 12, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 12, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Sep 12, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Sep 12, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 24, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Feb 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 24, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 7).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	4	E
2023	9	F
2025	7	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Utah avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.08	3.87	3.95	bottom 18% in Utah; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.73	1.17	0.69	bottom 17% in Utah; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.70	3.39	3.50	bottom 18% in Utah; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.47	0.88	0.48	bottom 11% in Utah; top 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	40.0	50.7	45.8	top 23% in Utah; top 36% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	40.6	42.9	top 1% in Utah; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.94, RN 0.69, weekend 2.58. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Government - County

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Bartholomew, Brenda	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2021
Blackham, Brady	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Blackham, Brady	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Care Transitions INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/06/2025
Gunnison Valley Hospital	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2014
Keele, Eddie	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/10/2025
Mission Health Services	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2014
Mission Health Services	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2014
Murray, Brian	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2014
Piquet, Shaeleen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/25/2023
Piquet, Shaeleen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/25/2023
Squire, Nikelle	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2024
Squire, Nikelle	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2024
Wootton, Zachary	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2024
Wootton, Zachary	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2024
Zimbelman, Michelle	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2026
Zimbelman, Michelle	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"How are lab results filed and reviewed, and how quickly does the doctor see abnormal results?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"What training do all staff get on dementia care and on spotting and reporting abuse?"
"How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Mission at Richfield Nursing and Rehabilitation	27.1 mi	Richfield, UT	★★★★☆	4/5
Stonehenge of Richfield	27.5 mi	Richfield, UT	★★★★☆	3/5
San Rafael Health and Rehabilitation	36.5 mi	Ferron, UT	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Centerfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465175.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Mission at Community Living Rehabilitation Center

10 West 400 South, Centerfield, UT 84622 · 4355282800

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "How are lab results filed and reviewed, and how quickly does the doctor see abnormal results?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "What training do all staff get on dementia care and on spotting and reporting abuse?"
☐ "How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 465175 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)