207 Chappell Drive, Bishopville, SC 29010 (opens Google Maps) · Lee County · (803) 484-5636· 120 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Sep 21, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARLYLE SENIOR CARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 5, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 16, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 6 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 5, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Apr 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888 |
| Apr 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Apr 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (1 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,512.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2024 | Fine | $8,512 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.81 | 4.08 | 3.95 | bottom 47% in South Carolina; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 31% in South Carolina; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.27 | 3.55 | 3.50 | bottom 46% in South Carolina; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.48 | bottom 33% in South Carolina; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.6 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 9% in South Carolina; top 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 11.1 | 42.1 | 42.9 | top 3% in South Carolina; top 4% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.42, weekend 3.00.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.50 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for McCoy Memorial Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnette, Braxton W | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Cranford, Richard | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/22/2025 |
| Cranford, Richard | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| New Day Health Ventures, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2016 |
| Barnette, Braxton W | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Barnette, Braxton W | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Barnette, Braxton W | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Barnette, Braxton W | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Barnette, Braxton W | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Carlyle Senior Care Management Company, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Carlyle Senior Care Management Company, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2025 |
| Cranford, Richard | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Cranford, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Cranford, Richard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Gibbs, Jeffrey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Gibbs, Jeffrey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Healthpro Heritage LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2025 |
| Healthpro Heritage LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2025 |
| New Day Health Ventures, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| New Day Senior Care Management | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carlyle Senior Care — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrell Nursing Center | 17.7 mi | Hartsville, SC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425174.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details