South CarolinaFlorence

Carlyle Senior Care of Florence

133 West Clarke Road, Florence, SC 29501 · Florence County · 88 certified beds · avg 76 residents/day · certified since Jun 16, 1988

Part of chain: CARLYLE SENIOR CARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.79
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 26, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Mar 26, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Mar 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Mar 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Mar 27, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Mar 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Feb 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202450F
202560F
202660F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.794.083.95bottom 45% in South Carolina; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.440.670.69bottom 29% in South Carolina; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.383.553.50top 48% in South Carolina; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.410.48top 32% in South Carolina; top 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)59.845.945.8bottom 18% in South Carolina; bottom 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)54.542.142.9bottom 27% in South Carolina; bottom 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.51, RN 0.41, weekend 3.12. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
New Day Health Ventures, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2016
Simon, ShirleyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Faith Healthcare Center4.0 miFlorence, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Honorage Nursing Center4.1 miFlorence, SC★★★★★5/5
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Florenc4.2 miFlorence, SC★★★★★4/5
Heritage Post Acute4.8 miFlorence, SC★★☆☆☆3/5
Veteran Village4.8 miFlorence, SC★★★★☆4/5
Southland Health Care Center4.8 miFlorence, SC★★★★☆4/5
Bethea Baptist Healthcare Center5.8 miDarlington, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Oakhaven Nursing Center8.1 miDarlington, SC★★★★★5/5
Medford Nursing Center8.5 miDarlington, SC★★★★☆4/5
The Palms at Florence10.4 miFlorence, SC★★★★★4/5
Morrell Nursing Center18.9 miHartsville, SC★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Florence →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425163.