West VirginiaBridgeport

Maplewood Healthcare Center

1081 Maplewood Drive, Bridgeport, WV 26330 · Harrison County · 77 certified beds · avg 76 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 2016

Part of chain: COMMUNICARE HEALTH (110 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$7,443
Fines, last 3 years
3.48
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 7, 2023 · F-0755 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Why it matters: Weak pharmacy services lead to medication mistakes, delays, and missed drug interactions that can seriously harm residents.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 11, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (42)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Jan 14, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Jan 14, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jan 14, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jan 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 7, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint
Jul 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Jul 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jul 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202290D
202341G ▲
2024130F
202580E
202680F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $7,443.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 7, 2023Fine$7,443

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWest Virginia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.483.553.95top 42% in West Virginia; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.670.700.69top 41% in West Virginia; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.073.073.50top 36% in West Virginia; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.400.48top 48% in West Virginia; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)62.344.145.8bottom 10% in West Virginia; bottom 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)45.542.442.9bottom 42% in West Virginia; bottom 43% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.67, weekend 3.06. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
C.R. Stoltz Family Investment Company INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
C.R. Stoltz Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Health Care Holdings, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
I. Rosedale Family Investment Company INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
I. Rosedale Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Marantz WV Holdings, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
R.S. Wilheim Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Rca Healthcare Holdings, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Rca NH Holdings Op Co., LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/14/2023
Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Rosedale Family Investment Company, INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
RRW, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
S.L. Rosedale Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Wilheim Family Investment Company, INC.OrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
BP WV Maplewood Mgt Co., LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
BP WV Maplewood Mgt Co., LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
C.R. Stoltz Family Investment Company INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
C.R. Stoltz Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Dixon, RebeccaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Dixon, RebeccaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bridgeport Healthcare Center2.9 miBridgeport, WV★★★★☆3/5
United Transitional Care Center3.0 miBridgeport, WV★★★★★5/5
River Oaks Healthcare Center6.2 miClarksburg, WV★★★☆☆2/5
Clarksburg Healthcare Center8.9 miClarksburg, WV★★★★☆3/5
Rosewood Center10.1 miGrafton, WV★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Taylor Healthcare Center10.9 miGrafton, WV★★★★★5/5
St. Barbara's Memorial Nursing Home11.5 miMonongah, WV★★★★☆4/5
Fairmont Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center LLC12.1 miFairmont, WV★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Tygart Center at Fairmont Campus12.6 miFairmont, WV★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pierpont Center at Fairmont Campus12.6 miFairmont, WV★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bridgeport →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 515194.