AlaskaWasilla

Maple Springs of Wasilla

3265 E Meridian Loop, Wasilla, AK 99654 · Matanuska-Susitna County · 67 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 2019

Part of chain: MAPLE SPRINGS LIVING (3 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.56
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jun 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
Jun 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Jun 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jun 21, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Mar 24, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 24, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Mar 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Mar 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023170F
2024130F
202530D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 21, 2024Payment Denial25 days from Sep 21, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityAlaska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.567.403.95bottom 25% in Alaska; top 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.772.280.69bottom 38% in Alaska; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.916.633.50bottom 25% in Alaska; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.141.590.48bottom 19% in Alaska; top 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.948.345.8top 23% in Alaska; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.146.042.9top 8% in Alaska; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 1.61, weekend 4.47. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bronshield LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest9%03/01/2025
Dunn, ElizabethIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/01/2025
Dunn, MarcIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/17/2017
Larmed, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest8%03/01/2025
Larsen, GregoryIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/17/2017
Larsen, LaurelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/01/2025
Larsen, RyanIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/01/2025
Maple Springs of Matsu Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest65%08/17/2017
Morpheus UniverseOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest9%03/01/2025
Pistis MercuryOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest9%03/01/2025
Bronshield LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Dahl, NathanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Dahl, NathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Dahl, NathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Dunn, MarcIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2017
Dunn, MarcIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2017
Jachimiec, JessicaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Jachimiec, JessicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Larmed, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Larsen, NicholasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Maple Springs of Palmer7.3 miPalmer, AK★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Wasilla →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 025038.