Maple Springs of Wasilla
3265 E Meridian Loop, Wasilla, AK 99654 · Matanuska-Susitna County · 67 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 2019
Part of chain: MAPLE SPRINGS LIVING (3 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (33)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 17 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2024 | Payment Denial | 25 days from Sep 21, 2024 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Alaska avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.56 | 7.40 | 3.95 | bottom 25% in Alaska; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.77 | 2.28 | 0.69 | bottom 38% in Alaska; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.91 | 6.63 | 3.50 | bottom 25% in Alaska; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.14 | 1.59 | 0.48 | bottom 19% in Alaska; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.9 | 48.3 | 45.8 | top 23% in Alaska; top 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.1 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 8% in Alaska; top 18% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 1.61, weekend 4.47. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronshield LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 03/01/2025 |
| Dunn, Elizabeth | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/01/2025 |
| Dunn, Marc | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/17/2017 |
| Larmed, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 03/01/2025 |
| Larsen, Gregory | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/17/2017 |
| Larsen, Laurel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/01/2025 |
| Larsen, Ryan | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/01/2025 |
| Maple Springs of Matsu Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 65% | 08/17/2017 |
| Morpheus Universe | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 03/01/2025 |
| Pistis Mercury | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 03/01/2025 |
| Bronshield LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Dahl, Nathan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Dahl, Nathan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Dahl, Nathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Dunn, Marc | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/17/2017 |
| Dunn, Marc | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/17/2017 |
| Jachimiec, Jessica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Jachimiec, Jessica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Larmed, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Larsen, Nicholas | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2019 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple Springs of Palmer | 7.3 mi | Palmer, AK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 1 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 025038.