Pennsylvania ›Erie

Manchester Commons of Presbyterian Seniorcare

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

6351 West Lake Road, Erie, PA 16505 (opens Google Maps) · Erie County · (814) 838-9191· 78 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Aug 13, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE NETWORK (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 2, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.02
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. F-0553

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628

View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553
Jul 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Jul 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
Jul 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jul 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jul 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Jul 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jul 2, 2025C · Potential for minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Sep 29, 2023B · Potential for minimal harm, patternThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
202450D
202580D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.02
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.29
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.54
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.023.943.95top 13% in Pennsylvania; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.290.800.69top 11% in Pennsylvania; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.543.583.50top 12% in Pennsylvania; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.910.560.48top 12% in Pennsylvania; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.644.545.8top 44% in Pennsylvania; top 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)27.339.942.9top 26% in Pennsylvania; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.93, RN 1.27, weekend 4.45.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.93 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Manchester Commons of Presbyterian Seniorcare. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Amann, CarolIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019
Bernhardt, AnitaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2021
Boslau, ToddIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2020
Boslau, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2020
Boslau, ToddIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2020
Boslau, ToddIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2020
Briody, KellyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/10/2020
Briody, KellyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2025
Feidler, FrederickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2007
Gray, RobertaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2012
Ohrn, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/17/1991
Pfadt, EllenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/06/2013
Pieffer, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2015
Presbyterian SeniorcareOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2014
Presbyterian SeniorcareOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2014
Presogna, EricIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2023
Seib, GaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Seib, GaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Seib, GaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Seib, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996

Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Seniorcare Network — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
  • "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
  • "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
  • "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "Where do you post your latest state inspection results and the ombudsman's contact information?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 43% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 21 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 16 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Fairview Manor0.3 miFairview, PA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lecom at Asbury Ridge DBA Saint Mary's Asbury Ridg2.0 miErie, PA★★★★★5/5
Pleasant Ridge Manor East/West2.4 miGirard, PA★★★★☆4/5
Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab5.3 miErie, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Lecom at Presque Isle, INC5.8 miErie, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Forestview6.2 miErie, PA★★★★★5/5
Millcreek Manor6.6 miErie, PA★★★★☆3/5
Lecom at Elmwood Gardens, LLC6.7 miErie, PA★★★★★5/5
Greenfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center6.9 miErie, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Sarah Reed Senior Living8.0 miErie, PA★★★★★5/5
Lecom at Village Square, LLC8.1 miErie, PA★★★★☆4/5
Pennsylvania Soldiers and Sailors Home9.0 miErie, PA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Erie, PA — 18 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Erie →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395996.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details