Manchester Commons of Presbyterian Seniorcare

Name: Manchester Commons of Presbyterian Seniorcare
Address: 6351 WEST LAKE ROAD, Erie, PA, 16505, US
Telephone: 8148389191

6351 West Lake Road, Erie, PA 16505 · Erie County · 78 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Aug 13, 1996

Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE NETWORK (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

5.02

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jul 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Jul 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jul 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jul 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 2, 2025	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Aug 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Aug 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 29, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 29, 2023	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	2	D
2024	5	D
2025	8	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Pennsylvania avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.02	3.94	3.95	top 13% in Pennsylvania; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.29	0.80	0.69	top 11% in Pennsylvania; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.54	3.58	3.50	top 12% in Pennsylvania; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.91	0.56	0.48	top 12% in Pennsylvania; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	42.6	44.5	45.8	top 44% in Pennsylvania; top 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	27.3	39.9	42.9	top 26% in Pennsylvania; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.93, RN 1.27, weekend 4.45. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Amann, Carol	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2019
Bernhardt, Anita	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/19/2021
Boslau, Todd	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/08/2020
Boslau, Todd	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/08/2020
Boslau, Todd	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/08/2020
Boslau, Todd	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/08/2020
Briody, Kelly	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/10/2020
Briody, Kelly	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/28/2025
Feidler, Frederick	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/09/2007
Gray, Roberta	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2012
Ohrn, James	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/17/1991
Pfadt, Ellen	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/06/2013
Pieffer, James	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/15/2015
Presbyterian Seniorcare	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2014
Presbyterian Seniorcare	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2014
Presogna, Eric	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2023
Seib, Gary	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1996
Seib, Gary	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1996
Seib, Gary	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1996
Seib, Gary	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1996

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Where do you post your latest state inspection results and the ombudsman's contact information?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Fairview Manor	0.3 mi	Fairview, PA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Lecom at Asbury Ridge DBA Saint Mary's Asbury Ridg	2.0 mi	Erie, PA	★★★★★	5/5
Pleasant Ridge Manor East/West	2.4 mi	Girard, PA	★★★★☆	4/5
Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab	5.3 mi	Erie, PA	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Lecom at Presque Isle, INC	5.8 mi	Erie, PA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Forestview	6.2 mi	Erie, PA	★★★★★	5/5
Millcreek Manor	6.6 mi	Erie, PA	★★★★☆	3/5
Lecom at Elmwood Gardens, LLC	6.7 mi	Erie, PA	★★★★★	5/5
Greenfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	6.9 mi	Erie, PA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Sarah Reed Senior Living	8.0 mi	Erie, PA	★★★★★	5/5
Lecom at Village Square, LLC	8.1 mi	Erie, PA	★★★★☆	4/5
Pennsylvania Soldiers and Sailors Home	9.0 mi	Erie, PA	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Erie →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395996.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Manchester Commons of Presbyterian Seniorcare

6351 West Lake Road, Erie, PA 16505 · 8148389191

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "Where do you post your latest state inspection results and the ombudsman's contact information?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 395996 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)