Manatee Springs Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
5627 9th St E, Bradenton, FL 34203 · Manatee County · 120 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Dec 18, 1985
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: JONATHAN BLEIER (18 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 4, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Feb 27, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 4, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Feb 27, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 4, 2026 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Feb 27, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (20)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Feb 4, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Feb 4, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint |
| Feb 27, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · from a complaint |
| Jun 20, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 3 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.98 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 8% in Florida; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.34 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 7% in Florida; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.44 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 10% in Florida; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 19% in Florida; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.6 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 46% in Florida; top 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 29.2 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 19% in Florida; top 28% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.04, RN 1.09, weekend 3.61. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bleier, Jonathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 47% | 12/31/2016 |
| Crestview 360 Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 47% | 04/01/2017 |
| Manatee Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/31/2016 |
| Schwartz, Joel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 12/31/2016 |
| Bleier, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2016 |
| Capital Funding Group, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/28/2019 |
| Oelfke, Steven | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Oelfke, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/2019 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "What training and competency checks do your nurse aides go through, and how do you keep their skills current?"
- "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenbriar Healthcare Rehabilitation and Nursing C | 2.7 mi | Bradenton, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Braden River Rehabilitation Center LLC | 3.8 mi | Bradenton, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at Bradenton | 3.9 mi | Bradenton, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Westminster Point Pleasant | 3.9 mi | Bradenton, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Sarasota | 4.1 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at Palma Sola Bay | 4.5 mi | Bradenton, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Surrey Place Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 4.6 mi | Bradenton, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Park Health Center by Harborview | 4.7 mi | Bradenton, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Siesta Key Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.8 mi | Sarasota, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Casa Mora Rehabilitation and Extended Care | 4.9 mi | Bradenton, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105525.