4081 East Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90023 (opens Google Maps) · Los Angeles County · (323) 267-0477· 39 certified beds · avg 38 residents/day · certified since Jun 9, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. F-0604
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Feb 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Feb 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 6, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 24, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $14,434.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2026 | Fine | $12,670 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | Fine | $1,764 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.54 | 4.31 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in California; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 33% in California; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.32 | 3.90 | 3.50 | bottom 1% in California; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.25 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 5% in California; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 20.8 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 8% in California; top 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 31.3 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 39% in California; top 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.61, RN 1.55, weekend 6.04.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.61 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: —/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Los Angeles Comm Hospital. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta Hospitals System LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/05/2007 |
| Chamber INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/01/2021 |
| David & Alexa Topper Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/15/2010 |
| Ivy Holdings INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/15/2010 |
| Ivy Intermediate Holding INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/15/2010 |
| Lee, Sang Bum | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/08/2007 |
| MPT of Bellflower PMH, L.P. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/23/2019 |
| MPT of Los Angeles PMH, L.P. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/23/2019 |
| MPT of Norwalk PMH, L.P. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/23/2019 |
| Prospect Medical Holdings INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/08/2007 |
| Elders, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2020 |
| Gorenstein, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/15/2016 |
| Hernandez, Hector | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2016 |
| James, Carmelo | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2016 |
| Johnson, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2020 |
| JP Morgan Chase, N.a. | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2016 |
| Lee, Sang Bum | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/08/2007 |
| Lee, Sang Bum | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/08/2007 |
| Sabillo, Alfredo | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/2020 |
| Samuels, Eric | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2019 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Costa Del Sol Healthcare | 0.6 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| East Los Angeles Doctors Hosp | 0.7 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Infinity Care of East Los Angeles | 2.0 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Hollenbeck Palms | 2.2 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maywood Skilled Nursing & Wellness Centre | 2.3 mi | Maywood, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| White Memorial Medical Ctr DP | 2.8 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Huntington Park Nursing Center | 3.1 mi | Huntington Park, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bell Convalescent Hospital | 3.5 mi | Bell, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare Center | 3.6 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Villa Del Rio | 3.9 mi | Bell Gardens, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Briarcrest Nursing Center | 4.1 mi | Bell Gardens, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Greenfield Care Center of South Gate | 4.3 mi | South Gate, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Los Angeles, CA — 369 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555638.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details