How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
800 Elsie Street, Turtle Creek, PA 15145 (opens Google Maps) · Allegheny County · (412) 825-9000· 60 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 9 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. F-0610
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. F-0580
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Oct 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Oct 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 26, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Aug 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.11 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 33% in Pennsylvania; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 31% in Pennsylvania; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.89 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 28% in Pennsylvania; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 31% in Pennsylvania; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.0 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 22% in Pennsylvania; top 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 38.5 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 49% in Pennsylvania; top 44% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.68, RN 0.75, weekend 3.48.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.68 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Lgar Health and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bazanos, Joann | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2008 |
| Bazanos, Joann | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2008 |
| Staller, Mary | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2017 |
| Staller, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2017 |
| Yesko, Marcia | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/27/2009 |
| Yesko, Marcia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/27/2009 |
All 6 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wecare at Monroeville Rehabilitation and Nsg Ctr | 2.6 mi | Monroeville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Monroeville Post Acute | 3.5 mi | Monroeville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woodhaven Health & Rehab Center | 4.2 mi | Monroeville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Concordia at the Cedars | 4.2 mi | Monroeville, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Harmony Physical Rehabilitation | 4.2 mi | Monroeville, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Burgh Care Center | 4.2 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Eldercrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 4.6 mi | Munhall, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Seneca Place | 4.7 mi | Verona, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Riverside Health & Rehab Center | 5.1 mi | McKeesport, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| John J Kane Regional Center-Mc | 5.2 mi | McKeesport, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Care Center | 5.5 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Longwood at Oakmont | 5.5 mi | Verona, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Allegheny, PA — 52 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395873.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details