TexasSan Antonio

Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center -

2003 W Hutchins Place, San Antonio, TX 78224 · Bexar County · 126 certified beds · avg 108 residents/day · certified since Oct 10, 2006

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.20
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint
May 15, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · from a complaint
May 15, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Sep 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Sep 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · from a complaint
Mar 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jul 28, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jul 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jul 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370F
2024100E
202580E
202670D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.203.463.95bottom 39% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.370.440.69bottom 46% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.803.043.50bottom 39% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.500.340.48top 13% in Texas; top 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.255.345.8top 36% in Texas; bottom 47% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.354.642.9top 20% in Texas; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.62, RN 0.42, weekend 3.17. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alexander, AlmaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/27/2020
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2017
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Hutchins Healthcare INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2017
Hutchins Healthcare INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/24/2025
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Martinez, FernandoIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2017
Martinez, FernandoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2017
Martinez, FernandoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2017
National Health Investors, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2017
Texas Nhi Investors, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2017
Yamsani, PradeepIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/30/2019
Yamsani, PradeepIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/30/2019
Yamsani, PradeepIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/30/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avir at San Antonio0.8 miSan Antonio, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare1.8 miSan Antonio, TX★★★☆☆2/5
San Jose Nursing Center1.9 miSan Antonio, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Windsor Mission Oaks3.8 miSan Antonio, TX★★★☆☆3/5
San Antonio West Nursing and Rehabilitation4.3 miSan Antonio, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Harbor Valley Health and Rehabilitation4.7 miSan Antonio, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
The Rio at Mission Trails5.1 miSan Antonio, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Highland Nursing Center6.4 miSan Antonio, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Mission at Blue Skies of Texas East6.9 miSan Antonio, TX★★★★★4/5
River City Care Center7.0 miSan Antonio, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in San Antonio →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676113.