KansasLansing

Lansing Care and Rehab

210 Plaza Drive, Lansing, KS 66043 · Leavenworth County · 58 certified beds · avg 51 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1992

Part of chain: MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES (30 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$23,454
Fines, last 3 years
3.78
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 17, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 3, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 19, 2023 · F-0690 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 17, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Dec 19, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jun 29, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 29, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 29, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 29, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jun 29, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 29, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260E
202311G ▲
202460D
2025100F
202611G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $23,454.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 27, 2026Fine$13,800
Dec 19, 2023Fine$9,654

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.784.583.95bottom 26% in Kansas; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.300.810.69bottom 1% in Kansas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.484.053.50bottom 32% in Kansas; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.490.48bottom 3% in Kansas; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.348.145.8top 45% in Kansas; bottom 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.042.042.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.76, RN 0.30, weekend 3.45. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Barres, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2019
Coronado Operator, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2019
Curis Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2019
T and C Capital Assets, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2019
Windward Health Partners LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2019
Barnes, MichelleIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2024
Barnes, MichelleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2024
Lansing Operator LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Lindeman, StuartIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Mission Health Communities, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Royer, CarlaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Thomas, TinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Yoakum, JamieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2024
Yoakum, JamieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Twin Oaks Health and Rehab0.8 miLansing, KS★★★★★4/5
Medicalodges Leavenworth3.7 miLeavenworth, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Aspire Senior Living Platte City9.5 miPlatte City, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Healthcare Resort of Kansas City10.9 miKansas City, KS★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Providence Place11.0 miKansas City, KS★★★★☆3/5
Riverbend Post Acute Rehabilitation12.0 miKansas City, KS★★★☆☆2/5
Life Care Center of Kansas City12.5 miKansas City, KS★★★☆☆2/5
Willow Point Rehabilitation and Nursing Center12.8 miKansas City, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Easton Health Care Center13.3 miEaston, KS★☆☆☆☆2/5
Bonner Springs Nursing & Rehab Center13.4 miBonner Springs, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care Cente13.5 miKansas City, MO★★★☆☆2/5
Tonganoxie Terrace14.3 miTonganoxie, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lansing →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175228.