McPherson Operator, LLC

Name: McPherson Operator, LLC
Address: 1601 N MAIN STREET, McPherson, KS, 67460, US
Telephone: 6202415360

1601 N Main Street, McPherson, KS 67460 · Mcpherson County · 45 certified beds · avg 38 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1999

Part of chain: MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES (30 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.61

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 23, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 20, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 23, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 7, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Aug 7, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Aug 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Aug 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Aug 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Aug 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Aug 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Aug 7, 2023	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Jan 19, 2022	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 19, 2022	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jan 19, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 19, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 19, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 19, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 6).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	6	0	F
2023	13	0	F
2025	6	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Kansas avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.61	4.58	3.95	bottom 22% in Kansas; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.56	0.81	0.69	bottom 25% in Kansas; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.26	4.05	3.50	bottom 22% in Kansas; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.37	0.49	0.48	bottom 37% in Kansas; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	42.6	48.1	45.8	top 37% in Kansas; top 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	42.9	42.0	42.9	bottom 45% in Kansas; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.74, RN 0.57, weekend 3.37. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Barres, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/26/2015
Crino, Bryan	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/26/2015
Feuer, Scott	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/26/2015
Kansas Operator LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	02/25/2015
Lindeman, Stuart	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/26/2015
Passero, Joseph	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/26/2015
T and C Capital Assets, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/26/2015
Windward Health Partners LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	02/26/2015
Lindeman, Stuart	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/26/2015
Mission Health Communities, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/26/2015
Yoakum, Jamie	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/19/2024
Yoakum, Jamie	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/19/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
"How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
"Who is your infection preventionist, and what training do they have?"
"How is pest control handled here, and when was the last treatment or inspection?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
The Cedars	1.2 mi	McPherson, KS	★★★☆☆	4/5
Pleasant View Home	12.4 mi	Inman, KS	★★★☆☆	3/5
Bethany Home Association	12.8 mi	Lindsborg, KS	★★★★★	4/5
Riverview Estates	14.3 mi	Marquette, KS	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Moundridge Manor	15.1 mi	Moundridge, KS	★★★★★	4/5
Pine Village	16.2 mi	Moundridge, KS	★★★☆☆	4/5
Sandstone Heights	19.0 mi	Little River, KS	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Buhler Sunshine Home	19.0 mi	Buhler, KS	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in McPherson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175437.

The Care File

Visit checklist — McPherson Operator, LLC

1601 N Main Street, McPherson, KS 67460 · 6202415360

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Apr 23, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
☐ "How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
☐ "Who is your infection preventionist, and what training do they have?"
☐ "How is pest control handled here, and when was the last treatment or inspection?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 175437 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)