How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Lakeview Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC
1050 Grand Dr, Bigfork, MT 59911 (opens Google Maps) · Flathead County · (406) 420-2201· — certified beds · avg — residents/day · certified since Jan 16, 2026 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS (19 facilities, chain avg rating 1.7★)
—/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 4, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
—
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: —/5 · CMS overall rating: —/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint F-0628
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint F-0677
View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| May 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · F-0825 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2025
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMontana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: Not reported
Montana average: 4.82
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: Not reported
Montana average: 1.17
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: Not reported
Montana average: 4.26
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Montana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | — | 4.82 | 3.95 | — |
| Registered Nurse hours | — | 1.17 | 0.69 | — |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | — | 4.26 | 3.50 | — |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | — | 0.71 | 0.48 | — |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 54.8 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 48.3 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total —, RN —, weekend —.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (— here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: —/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: —/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Lakeview Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myers, Katie | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Myers, Walter | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Swain, Holly | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Swain, Jared | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| White Ash LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 04/01/2024 |
| Cottonwood Healthcare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Cottonwood Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/27/2025 |
| Gedlaman, Derek | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2024 |
| Gedlaman, Derek | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/08/2025 |
| Gray, Amber | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2024 |
| Gray, Amber | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/08/2025 |
| Lakeview Health Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Lakeview Health Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Myers, Walter | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2024 |
| Professional Business Advisors LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Professional Business Advisors LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/27/2025 |
| Slattery & Holman P.C. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Slattery & Holman P.C. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/27/2025 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Charly Bello Family, the Maze Family, the Swain Family, & Walter Myers — 19 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Northern Pines Rehabilitation and Nursing — Cut Bank, MT · overall 2/5
- River Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC — Billings, MT · overall 2/5
- Valle Vista Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC — Lewistown, MT · overall 3/5
- Highland Manor of Elko Rehabilitation LLC — Elko, NV · overall 2/5
- Highland Manor of Fallon Rehabilitation LLC — Fallon, NV · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Highland Manor of Mesquite Rehabilitation LLC — Mesquite, NV · overall 4/5
- Accel at Longmont Health and Rehab, LLC — Longmont, CO · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Colonial Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC — Colorado Springs, CO · overall 1/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 18 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immanuel Skilled Care Center | 14.9 mi | Kalispell, MT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Brendan House | 15.3 mi | Kalispell, MT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Kalispell Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC | 15.6 mi | Kalispell, MT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Flathead, MT — 6 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Montana Veterans Home N H — Columbia Falls, MT · overall 3/5abuse
- Whitefish Care and Rehabilitation — Whitefish, MT · overall —/5SFF
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 275160.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).