MontanaKalispell

Immanuel Skilled Care Center

185 Crestline Ave, Kalispell, MT 59901 · Flathead County · 155 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1989

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 31, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 31, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Aug 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024140F
202570F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMontana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.004.823.95top 36% in Montana; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.021.170.69bottom 48% in Montana; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.774.263.50top 29% in Montana; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.690.710.48top 41% in Montana; top 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.254.845.8top 15% in Montana; top 37% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.348.342.9top 20% in Montana; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.37, RN 0.89, weekend 4.16. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cronk, JasonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/05/2013
Cronk, JasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/05/2013
Engellant, DarenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Engellant, DarenIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Erfle, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Erfle, JohnIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Habel, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Habel, DavidIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Heim, JamesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Heim, JamesIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Immanuel Lutheran CorporationOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/17/1953
Immanuel Lutheran CorporationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/17/1953
Kirk, AndrewIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Kirk, AndrewIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Langohr, CallieIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Langohr, CallieIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Nelson, DouglasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Nelson, DouglasIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Nelson, SethIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Nelson, SethIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Brendan House0.5 miKalispell, MT★★★☆☆3/5
Kalispell Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC0.7 miKalispell, MT★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Montana Veterans Home N H12.2 miColumbia Falls, MT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Whitefish Care and Rehabilitation13.4 miWhitefish, MT—/5SFF
Lakeview Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC14.9 miBigfork, MT—/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Kalispell →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 275129.