Colonial Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC
1340 E Fillmore St, Colorado Springs, CO 80907 · El Paso County · 80 certified beds · avg 76 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1985
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS (19 facilities, chain avg rating 1.7★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 24, 2025 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Aug 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 24, 2025 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Aug 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 31, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Sep 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (39)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jul 24, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Oct 17, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor a resident's right to choose their own attending doctor. Residents get to decide which physician oversees their care. · from a complaint |
| Aug 31, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 13).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 14 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 15 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $24,453, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2023 | Fine | $24,453 |
| Aug 31, 2023 | Payment Denial | 40 days from Sep 29, 2023 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Colorado avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.86 | 3.89 | 3.95 | bottom 8% in Colorado; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.31 | 0.86 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in Colorado; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.58 | 3.44 | 3.50 | bottom 9% in Colorado; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.61 | 0.48 | bottom 5% in Colorado; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.5 | 47.1 | 45.8 | bottom 13% in Colorado; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 90.0 | 44.6 | 42.9 | bottom 4% in Colorado; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.08, RN 0.33, weekend 2.78. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charly Bello Family Limited Partnership | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Mahrt, David | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Maze Family Limited Partnership | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Myers, Adelaide | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/12/2014 |
| Myers, Katie | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Myers, Mallory | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/12/2024 |
| Myers, Walter | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Pickd LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Swain, Hannah | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/12/2024 |
| Swain, Holly | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Swain, Jared | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Swain, Taylor | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/12/2024 |
| Cottonwood Healthcare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Professional Business Advisors LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/17/2025 |
| Reddy, Vikas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2025 |
| Turley, Ryan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Turley, Ryan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/17/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pikes Peak Post Acute | 0.6 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Springs Village Care Center | 1.7 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sunny Vista Living Center | 2.3 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Medallion Post Acute Rehabilitation | 2.6 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs | 2.7 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Center at Centennial, the | 2.8 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Advanced Health Care of Colorado Springs | 3.1 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Colorado Springs | 3.2 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Kiowa Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC | 3.3 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Fountain View Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC | 4.0 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bear Creek Senior Living | 4.1 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Sundance Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 4.2 mi | Colorado Springs, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Colorado Springs →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065225.