How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
13825 Hunton Lane, Huntersville, NC 28078 (opens Google Maps) · Mecklenburg County · (704) 897-2700· 114 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Oct 31, 2007 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP (126 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 25, 2023 · F-0791
The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Why it matters: Dental problems left untreated cause pain, infection, and trouble eating, which can lead to weight loss.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Sep 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Sep 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint · F-0757 |
| Sep 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| May 25, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed. · F-0914 |
| May 25, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.61 | 4.01 | 3.95 | bottom 45% in North Carolina; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.69 | top 30% in North Carolina; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.11 | 3.56 | 3.50 | bottom 37% in North Carolina; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 31% in North Carolina; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 77.2 | 49.0 | 45.8 | bottom 4% in North Carolina; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 61.9 | 45.7 | 42.9 | bottom 26% in North Carolina; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.63, weekend 2.97.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.44 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Lakeside Health & Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Federal
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Hopping, Darin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Hopping, Darin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Jones, Joyce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/16/2025 |
| Jones, Joyce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/16/2025 |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Ohl Asset (NC) Huntersville SNF, LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Ohl Asset (NC) Huntersville SNF, LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Patel, Sandeep | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/08/2025 |
| Saber Governance LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Saber Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Saber Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/24/2026 |
| SHG Boa LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/24/2026 |
| SHG Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| SHG Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| SHG Mt, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/24/2026 |
| TCF National Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Saber Healthcare Group — 126 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 125 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huntersville Health & Rehabilitation Center | 1.2 mi | Huntersville, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Huntersville Oaks | 2.3 mi | Huntersville, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Care of Cornelius | 3.9 mi | Cornelius, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| University Place Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 9.7 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rockwell Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 9.8 mi | Charlotte, NC | —/5 | SFF | |
| Glenwood Health & Rehabilitation | 11.0 mi | Mooresville, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Crown Haven Health and Rehabilitation | 11.1 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation Center | 11.3 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Crestview Health & Rehabilitation | 11.7 mi | Mooresville, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| The Gardens of Taylor Glen Retirement Community | 12.4 mi | Concord, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Stanley Total Living Center | 13.0 mi | Stanley, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pine Crest Health & Rehabilitation | 13.4 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Mecklenburg, NC — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345541.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details