TennesseeHuntingdon

Huntingdon Health & Rehabilitation Center

635 High Street, Huntingdon, TN 38344 · Carroll County · 120 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Jun 9, 1988

Part of chain: PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$52,156
Fines, last 3 years
3.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 14, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Oct 6, 2021 · F-0678

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 15, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Oct 6, 2021 · F-0835

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 15, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Oct 6, 2021 · F-0867

The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Why it matters: Without a working quality program, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 15, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 14, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 6, 2021▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Oct 6, 2021▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Oct 6, 2021▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Oct 6, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 6, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Oct 6, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 6, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 6, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Oct 6, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202193K ▲
202460E
202511J ▲
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $52,156.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 14, 2025Fine$52,156

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTennessee avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.743.623.95top 33% in Tennessee; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.570.69top 38% in Tennessee; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.003.153.50bottom 48% in Tennessee; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.390.48top 29% in Tennessee; top 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.248.945.8top 49% in Tennessee; bottom 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)44.443.242.9bottom 45% in Tennessee; bottom 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.41, RN 0.53, weekend 2.74. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
B&y Healthcare S CorpOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%12/31/2019
B&y TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%12/31/2019
Cody Healthcare S CorpOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%12/31/2019
Craig Flashner 2007 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%12/31/2019
Flashner, CraigIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2019
Flashner, CraigIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2019
Kirk, KristineIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Norcross, RobertIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2007
Northpoint Regional LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2007
Perlstein, YitzchokIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2019
Prestige Administrative Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Rogers, StaceyIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Life Care Center of Bruceton-Hollow Rock8.9 miBruceton, TN★★★★★5/5
Waters of McKenzie a Rehabilitation & Nursing Ctr9.2 miMC Kenzie, TN★★☆☆☆3/5
Ahc McKenzie9.2 miMC Kenzie, TN★★★★☆5/5
Camden Healthcare & Rehab Center16.9 miCamden, TN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Patriot Health and Rehabilitation Center19.5 miParis, TN★★★☆☆3/5
Henry County Health and Rehabilitation19.8 miParis, TN★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Huntingdon →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445210.