VirginiaEast Lexington

Heritage Hall Lexington

205 Houston Street, East Lexington, VA 24450 · Lexington City County · 60 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1997

Part of chain: HERITAGE HALL (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.1★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.70
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 21, 2022 · F-0658

The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 31, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 21, 2022 · F-0757

The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Why it matters: Unneeded drugs expose residents to side effects, drowsiness, falls, and dangerous interactions.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 31, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Aug 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Aug 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 21, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 12, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
May 12, 2021B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202120E
202222G ▲
202420E
2025130E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityVirginia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.703.673.95top 29% in Virginia; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.680.660.69top 24% in Virginia; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.293.213.50top 29% in Virginia; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.310.460.48bottom 42% in Virginia; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.248.145.8top 37% in Virginia; top 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.348.242.9top 22% in Virginia; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.05, RN 0.56, weekend 2.72. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ahc Acquisitions, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12%07/10/2020
CRC Blind TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest7%07/10/2020
WCC Third Blind TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest78%07/10/2020
American Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/22/2010
Cranwell, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2024
CRC Blind TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2020
Dalton, BradIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2024
Dalton, BradIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2024
Dalton, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2024
Dalton, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/21/2014
Dalton, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/21/2014
East, ThomasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2024
East, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/21/2014
East, ThomasIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2026
East, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/21/2014
Gallant, CassandraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2024
Gallant, CassandraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2024
Hopkins, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Kendal at Lexington1.1 miLexington, VA★★★★☆2/5
Shenandoah Valley Health and Rehab5.3 miBuena Vista, VA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in East Lexington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495321.