How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2325 Lodge Drive, Gering, NE 69341 (opens Google Maps) · Scott Bluff County · (308) 436-5007· 102 certified beds · avg 96 residents/day · certified since Dec 20, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: VETTER SENIOR LIVING (22 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. F-0803
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. F-0552
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Nebraska avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.10 | 4.33 | 3.95 | top 17% in Nebraska; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.02 | 0.72 | 0.69 | top 16% in Nebraska; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.41 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 18% in Nebraska; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.67 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 17% in Nebraska; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.5 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 41% in Nebraska; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 19.0 | 44.1 | 42.9 | top 16% in Nebraska; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.44, RN 0.89, weekend 3.84.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.44 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Heritage Estates. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vetter Senior Living | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/23/2016 |
| Longoria, Tara | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Longoria, Tara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Morris, Cory | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/24/2018 |
| Morris, Cory | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/24/2018 |
| Stuhr, Brian | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Stuhr, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2017 |
| Stuhr, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vanekeren, Glenn | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vanekeren, Glenn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2017 |
| Vanekeren, Glenn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vetter Senior Living | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/23/2016 |
| Vetter, Eldora | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vetter, Eldora | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2017 |
| Vetter, Eldora | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vetter, Jack | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Vetter, Jack | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2017 |
| Vetter, Jack | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| VSL Vetter Health Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Vetter Senior Living — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northfield Retirement Communities Care Center | 3.7 mi | Scottsbluff, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare and Nursing Center | 4.5 mi | Scottsbluff, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mitchell Care Center | 10.7 mi | Mitchell, NE | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Chimney Rock Villa | 18.9 mi | Bayard, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285071.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details