TexasAmarillo

Heritage Convalescent Center

1009 Clyde St, Amarillo, TX 79106 · Potter County · 116 certified beds · avg 72 residents/day · certified since Aug 25, 1983

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.53
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 9, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jul 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jun 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Oct 2, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Oct 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Aug 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency.
Aug 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340F
2024120F
2025110F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.533.463.95top 33% in Texas; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.290.440.69bottom 26% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.073.043.50top 36% in Texas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.340.48bottom 43% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)57.055.345.8bottom 39% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)57.154.642.9bottom 46% in Texas; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.00, RN 0.33, weekend 3.48. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Dick and Joilue Stebbins Son's TrustOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/04/1996
Stebbins Heritage, INC.Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/08/1999
Stebbins, RichardIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1998
Bailey, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Bailey, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Dick and Joilue Stebbins Son's TrustOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/04/1996
Stebbins Heritage, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Stebbins Heritage, INC.OrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/08/1999
Stebbins Heritage, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Stebbins, RichardIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1998
Stebbins, RichardIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1998
Stebbins, RichardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1998

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Windflower Health Center0.1 miAmarillo, TX★★★★☆4/5
Amarillo Medical Lodge0.2 miAmarillo, TX★★★★★5/5
Amarillo Center for Skilled Care0.7 miAmarillo, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Landmark of Amarillo Rehabilitation and Nursing Ce0.8 miAmarillo, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Kirkland Court Health and Rehabilitation Center0.9 miAmarillo, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Ussery Roan Texas State Veterans Home1.1 miAmarillo, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Five Points Nursing and Rehabilitation1.8 miAmarillo, TX★★★★☆4/5
Ware Memorial Care Center3.4 miAmarillo, TX★★★★☆3/5
Legacy Rehabilitation and Living3.7 miAmarillo, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Georgia Manor Nursing Home3.8 miAmarillo, TX★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Amarillo →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455480.