PennsylvaniaGrove City

Grove Manor

435 North Broad Street, Grove City, PA 16127 · Mercer County · 59 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1981

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$18,837
Fines, last 3 years
4.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 22, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 30, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 22, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 30, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Sep 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 22, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Nov 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023110E
202432G ▲
202530D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $18,837.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 22, 2024Fine$18,837

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.413.943.95top 25% in Pennsylvania; top 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.820.800.69top 33% in Pennsylvania; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.943.583.50top 27% in Pennsylvania; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.480.560.48top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.244.545.8bottom 45% in Pennsylvania; bottom 47% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.939.942.9bottom 43% in Pennsylvania; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.99, RN 0.74, weekend 3.56. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Dunlap, ElizabethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/14/2014
Guy, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Scott, NancyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Scott, PhilIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Weston, GaretIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Quality Life Services - Grove City0.2 miGrove City, PA★★★★☆3/5
Orchard Manor1.1 miGrove City, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove Care Center4.6 miHarrisville, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Avalon Springs Care Center10.4 miMercer, PA★★★★☆4/5
Quality Life Services - Mercer10.5 miMercer, PA★★★★★4/5
Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare13.4 miNew Wilmington, PA★★★★★5/5
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at New Wilmington13.6 miNew Wilmington, PA★★★★☆4/5
Jameson Nursing and Rehab Center16.4 miNew Castle, PA★★★★★5/5
Haven Convalescent Home, INC17.5 miNew Castle, PA★★★★★5/5
Edison Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center17.7 miNew Castle, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avalon Care Center18.0 miNew Castle, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Quality Life Services - New Castle18.0 miNew Castle, PA★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Grove City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395510.