1 Matthew Drive, Pottsville, PA 17901 (opens Google Maps) · Schuylkill County · (570) 644-0489· 48 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Mar 11, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 28, 2024 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Dec 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · F-0745 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Dec 27, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 17 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $10,033.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2024 | Fine | $10,033 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.57 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 47% in Pennsylvania; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.23 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 44% in Pennsylvania; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 48% in Pennsylvania; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 54.0 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in Pennsylvania; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 60.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 16% in Pennsylvania; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.71, weekend 3.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.69 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Green Valley Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eaz Operating Company, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/28/2023 |
| Help for the Kids, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/28/2023 |
| Pa Tenant 3 Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 03/28/2023 |
| Pa Tenant 3 Mezz Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/28/2023 |
| Pa Tenant 3 Mezz, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 03/28/2023 |
| Belles, Danielle | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Belles, Danielle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Eye, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Eye, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Keefer, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Keefer, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Kelly, Michael | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Kelly, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Kelly, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Kuzio, Stephen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Kuzio, Stephen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Lazur, Diana | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Lazur, Diana | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Martin, Bonita | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Martin, Bonita | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 30 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 10 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gardens at York Terrace, the | 0.2 mi | Pottsville, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Edenbrook of Greenwood Hill | 2.3 mi | Pottsville, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Schuylkill Center | 2.9 mi | Pottsville, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rosewood Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 4.2 mi | Schuylkill Haven, PA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Seton Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.2 mi | Orwigsburg, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Orwigsburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 7.0 mi | Orwigsburg, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Broad Mountain Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.1 mi | Frackville, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Tremont Health & Rehabilitation Center | 9.0 mi | Tremont, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Shenandoah Senior Living Community | 10.4 mi | Shenandoah, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ridgeview Healthcare & Rehab Center | 10.5 mi | Shenandoah, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mount Carmel Senior Living Community | 13.5 mi | Mt Carmel, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Laurel Center | 14.2 mi | Hamburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Schuylkill, PA — 13 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 396086.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details