Shenandoah Senior Living Community
101 E. Washington St, Shenandoah, PA 17976 · Schuylkill County · 119 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1982
Part of chain: CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS (9 facilities, chain avg rating 1.2★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 7, 2026 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Jan 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 7, 2026 · F-0658 · triggered by a complaint
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jan 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 16, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 27, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (40)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated. · from a complaint |
| May 1, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| May 1, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. |
| May 1, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| May 1, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| May 1, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| May 1, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| May 1, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| May 1, 2026 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint |
| Jan 7, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Jan 7, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint |
| Jul 2, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. |
| May 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| May 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · from a complaint |
| May 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint |
| May 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint |
| May 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Mar 27, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint |
| Mar 27, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Mar 27, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint |
| Mar 27, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint |
| Feb 16, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Oct 4, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint |
| Oct 4, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 21 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 12 | 2 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $76,285, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2026 | Fine | $12,650 |
| Feb 16, 2024 | Fine | $63,635 |
| Feb 16, 2024 | Payment Denial | 20 days from May 16, 2024 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.48 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 41% in Pennsylvania; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 28% in Pennsylvania; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.22 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 44% in Pennsylvania; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 20% in Pennsylvania; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.9 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 43% in Pennsylvania; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 28% in Pennsylvania; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.13, RN 0.46, weekend 2.89. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Eagles LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2023 |
| Apostrophe Opco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/31/2023 |
| Cedar View Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 44% | 01/31/2023 |
| Leiser, Asher | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/31/2023 |
| Samara Family Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 44% | 01/31/2023 |
| Sebbag, Gabriel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/31/2023 |
| 101 E Washington Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2023 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2023 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2025 |
| Lazur, Diana | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2023 |
| Lazur, Diana | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Leiser, Asher | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2023 |
| Leiser, Asher | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2023 |
| Priority Care Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2023 |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2023 |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2025 |
| Tarson, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/19/2023 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you make sure residents — especially those who can't ask — get enough fluids throughout the day?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ridgeview Healthcare & Rehab Center | 0.4 mi | Shenandoah, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Broad Mountain Health and Rehabilitation Center | 3.7 mi | Frackville, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Schuylkill Center | 8.9 mi | Pottsville, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Edenbrook of Greenwood Hill | 9.6 mi | Pottsville, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Green Valley Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce | 10.4 mi | Pottsville, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Gardens at York Terrace, the | 10.5 mi | Pottsville, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Greenwood Center for Nursing and Rehab | 12.2 mi | Tamaqua, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Seton Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 12.4 mi | Orwigsburg, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Orwigsburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 12.5 mi | Orwigsburg, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Rosewood Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 12.6 mi | Schuylkill Haven, PA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Mount Carmel Senior Living Community | 13.2 mi | Mt Carmel, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| St Luke's Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 14.9 mi | Coaldale, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Shenandoah →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395556.