How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
6950 Germantown Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19119 (opens Google Maps) · Philadelphia County · (215) 848-3306· 180 certified beds · avg 175 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint F-0657
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Aug 1, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 1, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 1, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Aug 1, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Aug 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Aug 1, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.15 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 31% in Pennsylvania; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.55 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 36% in Pennsylvania; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.77 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 32% in Pennsylvania; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 15% in Pennsylvania; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 26.4 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 9% in Pennsylvania; top 9% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 18.2 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 12% in Pennsylvania; top 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.63, RN 0.48, weekend 3.29.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.63 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Germantown Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newcourtland | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/22/1994 |
| Demarco, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Demarco, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Duffey, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| Duffey, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| Howard, Pamela | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2019 |
| Kent, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| McGrath, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Naylor, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Newcourtland | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/17/2025 |
| Rockingham, Dameica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/19/2021 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caring Heart Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 0.7 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Liberty Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 1.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cliveden Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wesley Enhanced Living at Stapeley | 1.2 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maplewood Nursing and Rehab Center | 1.8 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Willow Terrace | 1.8 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Ivy Hill Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC | 1.9 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wyndmoor Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.0 mi | Wyndmoor, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Fairview Rehab and Care Center | 2.2 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Chestnut Hill Lodge Health and Rehab Ctr | 2.3 mi | Wyndmoor, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Accela Rehab and Care Center at Springfield | 2.7 mi | Glenside, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| York Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Philadelphia, PA — 46 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395360.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details