Electra Healthcare Center
511 S Bailey Street, Electra, TX 76360 · Wichita County · 62 certified beds · avg 29 residents/day · certified since Mar 30, 1992
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (17)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. |
| Jan 7, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jan 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Jan 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Jan 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jan 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Jan 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 7, 2025 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.96 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 16% in Texas; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.84 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 6% in Texas; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.40 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 19% in Texas; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.53 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 11% in Texas; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.2 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 43% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 41% in Texas; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.31, RN 0.92, weekend 3.70. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electra Hospital District | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Haws, Dennis | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2024 |
| McCain, Rebecca | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Delizio, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Electra Hospital District | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2024 |
| Electra Hospital District | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Haws, Dennis | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2024 |
| Haws, Dennis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2024 |
| Haws, Dennis | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| McCain, Rebecca | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| McCain, Rebecca | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What training do new hires get before working with residents, and what ongoing training do all staff receive?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Can I see the actual room my family member would live in before we decide?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir at Burkburnett | 20.8 mi | Burkburnett, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sheridan Medical Lodge | 21.3 mi | Burkburnett, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| University Park Nursing and Rehabilitation | 23.6 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Texhoma Christian Care Center INC | 23.6 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rolling Meadows | 23.8 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | —/5 | ||
| Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Vernon | 24.2 mi | Vernon, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita | 25.3 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Swan Health at Wichita Falls | 25.8 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Midwestern Healthcare Center | 27.5 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Senior Care Health & Rehabilitation Center - Wichi | 27.5 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Seymour Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 35.9 mi | Seymour, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675021.