How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
511 S Bailey Street, Electra, TX 76360 (opens Google Maps) · Wichita County · (940) 495-2184· 62 certified beds · avg 29 residents/day · certified since Mar 30, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. F-0940
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. · F-0940 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Jan 7, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Jan 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Jan 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 7, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.96 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 16% in Texas; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.84 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 6% in Texas; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.40 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 19% in Texas; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.53 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 11% in Texas; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.2 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 43% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 41% in Texas; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.31, RN 0.92, weekend 3.70.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Electra Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electra Hospital District | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Haws, Dennis | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2024 |
| McCain, Rebecca | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Delizio, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Electra Hospital District | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2024 |
| Electra Hospital District | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Haws, Dennis | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2024 |
| Haws, Dennis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2024 |
| Haws, Dennis | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| McCain, Rebecca | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| McCain, Rebecca | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir at Burkburnett | 20.8 mi | Burkburnett, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sheridan Medical Lodge | 21.3 mi | Burkburnett, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| University Park Nursing and Rehabilitation | 23.6 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Texhoma Christian Care Center INC | 23.6 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rolling Meadows | 23.8 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | —/5 | ||
| Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Vernon | 24.2 mi | Vernon, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita | 25.3 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Swan Health at Wichita Falls | 25.8 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Midwestern Healthcare Center | 27.5 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Senior Care Health & Rehabilitation Center - Wichi | 27.5 mi | Wichita Falls, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Seymour Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 35.9 mi | Seymour, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675021.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details