How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
975 Mitchell Road, Sedalia, MO 65301 (opens Google Maps) · Pettis County · (660) 851-0668· 66 certified beds · avg 58 residents/day · certified since Oct 3, 2016 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint F-0658
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint F-0692
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jan 22, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 22, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Jan 22, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 14, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 14, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 14, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 6.60 | 3.66 | 3.95 | top 2% in Missouri; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 47% in Missouri; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 6.01 | 3.22 | 3.50 | top 1% in Missouri; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.48 | bottom 30% in Missouri; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.6 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 9% in Missouri; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 16.7 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 8% in Missouri; top 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.85, RN 0.38, weekend 5.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for E W Thompson Health & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia G. Thompson Residence Center, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2016 |
| Epperson, Karen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2024 |
| Epperson, Karen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2024 |
| Fischer, Adam | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/18/2025 |
| Fischer, Joyce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2016 |
| Fischer, Joyce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2016 |
| Residential Health Management, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2016 |
| Residential Health Management, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/18/2025 |
| Shumake, William J. | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2016 |
| Shumake, William J. | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2016 |
| Simon, Dianne | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Simon, Dianne | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Simon, Dianne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2016 |
| Sylvia G. Thompson Charitable Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/26/2015 |
| Sylvia G. Thompson Residence Center, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| West, Kristen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| West, Kristen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Williams, Audrea | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/2025 |
| Williams, Audrea | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia G Thompson Residence Center, INC | 0.3 mi | Sedalia, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fair View Health Care Center | 1.6 mi | Sedalia, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rest Haven Health Care Center | 3.0 mi | Sedalia, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Four Seasons Living Center | 6.8 mi | Sedalia, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Good Samaritan Care Center | 17.4 mi | Cole Camp, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 17.9 mi | Windsor, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265858.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details