Fair View Health Care Center

Name: Fair View Health Care Center
Address: 1714 W 16TH STREET, Sedalia, MO, 65301, US
Telephone: 6608271594

1714 W 16th Street, Sedalia, MO 65301 · Pettis County · 75 certified beds · avg 62 residents/day · certified since Jul 12, 2016

Part of chain: RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT (34 facilities, chain avg rating 1.2★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

2.68

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 22, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules.
Apr 22, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Apr 22, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 22, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Apr 22, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 22, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 22, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Apr 22, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training.
Apr 22, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 22, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Apr 22, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 22, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Aug 20, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Jun 9, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jun 9, 2025	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 29, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Aug 29, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 29, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 29, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Aug 29, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 29, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Aug 29, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Aug 29, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Aug 29, 2024	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Aug 29, 2024	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Oct 13, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · from a complaint
Oct 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
May 18, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 18, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 18, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
May 18, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 18, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 18, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 18, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 12).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	9	F
2024	11	F
2025	5	E
2026	12	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Missouri avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.68	3.66	3.95	bottom 15% in Missouri; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.23	0.49	0.69	bottom 14% in Missouri; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.39	3.22	3.50	bottom 17% in Missouri; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.24	0.33	0.48	bottom 43% in Missouri; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	0.0	56.0	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	0.0	47.8	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.64, RN 0.31, weekend 3.25. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Arshad, Abdullah	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/16/2024
Arshad, Abdullah	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/16/2024
Brunswick Park Associates INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/16/2025
Destefane, Richard	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
Destefane, Richard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/23/2025
Fair View Associates I, L.L.C.	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/23/2025
McDonald, Everlyn	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
McDonald, Everlyn	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
RCG INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/15/2024
Reliant Care Group LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/15/2024
Reliant Care Group of Webster INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/31/2024
Reliant Care Management Company LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2024
Richard J. Destefane Revocable Living Trust	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/15/2024
TLG II LLP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/31/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Do you accept Medicaid from day one, and will you put in writing that no private payment is required as a condition of admission?"
"Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
"What training and competency checks do your nurse aides go through, and how do you keep their skills current?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Sylvia G Thompson Residence Center, INC	1.3 mi	Sedalia, MO	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Rest Haven Health Care Center	1.4 mi	Sedalia, MO	★☆☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
E W Thompson Health & Rehabilitation Center	1.6 mi	Sedalia, MO	★★★☆☆	3/5
Four Seasons Living Center	5.3 mi	Sedalia, MO	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Good Samaritan Care Center	16.6 mi	Cole Camp, MO	★★★★★	5/5
Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care Center	18.7 mi	Windsor, MO	★★☆☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sedalia →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265856.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Fair View Health Care Center

1714 W 16th Street, Sedalia, MO 65301 · 6608271594

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 1/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Do you accept Medicaid from day one, and will you put in writing that no private payment is required as a condition of admission?"
☐ "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
☐ "What training and competency checks do your nurse aides go through, and how do you keep their skills current?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 265856 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)