MissouriSaint Louis

Barnes-Jewish Extended Care

401 Corporate Park Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63105 · St. Louis County · 120 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Oct 10, 1990

Part of chain: BJC HEALTHCARE (4 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jul 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 18, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Nov 18, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 18, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Nov 18, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Nov 18, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 18, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Nov 18, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules.
Nov 18, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202280E
202490E
202520D
2026110E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.513.663.95top 19% in Missouri; top 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.800.490.69top 8% in Missouri; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.643.223.50top 29% in Missouri; top 36% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.580.330.48top 6% in Missouri; top 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.556.045.8top 43% in Missouri; bottom 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)58.847.842.9bottom 33% in Missouri; bottom 23% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.09, RN 0.90, weekend 4.12. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Arevalo, JesseIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/31/2020
Barnes Jewish HospitalOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/11/1992
Barnes Jewish HospitalOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/11/1992
Barnes Jewish HospitalOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/11/1992
Bethesda Health Group INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Bethesda Health Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/24/2025
Brown, CandiceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Brown, CandiceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2025
Byrne, RogerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Byrne, RogerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2025
Cannon, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2020
Cannon, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2020
Dubinsky, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Dubinsky, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Fessler, PaulaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Goldberg, SusanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Goldberg, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Gorman, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Gorman, MaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Gupta, MahendraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
McKnight Place Extended Care1.8 miSaint Louis, MO★★★★☆4/5
Monarch Springs Wellness & Rehabilitation2.4 miUniversity City, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
U-City Forest Manor2.4 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Oak Park Care Center2.7 miSaint Louis, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Lutheran Convalescent Home3.0 miWebster Groves, MO★★★★★4/5
Normandy Nursing Center3.5 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Delhaven Manor3.7 miSaint Louis, MO★★★☆☆2/5
St Johns Place4.7 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Mary, Queen and Mother Center4.7 miShrewsbury, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Bernard Care Center5.0 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Bentleys Extended Care5.2 miOverland, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Bethesda Dilworth5.3 miSaint Louis, MO★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saint Louis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265439.