How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Barnes-Jewish Extended Care
401 Corporate Park Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63105 (opens Google Maps) · St. Louis County · (314) 725-7447· 120 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Oct 10, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BJC HEALTHCARE (4 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 6, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. F-0563
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. · F-0563 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jul 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| May 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules. · F-0620 |
| Nov 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 10).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 11 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.51
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.80
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.64
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.51 | 3.66 | 3.95 | top 19% in Missouri; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.80 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 8% in Missouri; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.64 | 3.22 | 3.50 | top 29% in Missouri; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.58 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 6% in Missouri; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 54.5 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 43% in Missouri; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 58.8 | 47.8 | 42.9 | bottom 33% in Missouri; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.09, RN 0.90, weekend 4.12.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.09 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Barnes-Jewish Extended Care. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arevalo, Jesse | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/31/2020 |
| Barnes Jewish Hospital | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/1992 |
| Barnes Jewish Hospital | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/1992 |
| Barnes Jewish Hospital | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/1992 |
| Bethesda Health Group INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Bethesda Health Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/24/2025 |
| Brown, Candice | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Brown, Candice | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/10/2025 |
| Byrne, Roger | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Byrne, Roger | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/10/2025 |
| Cannon, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2020 |
| Cannon, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2020 |
| Dubinsky, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Dubinsky, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Fessler, Paula | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2023 |
| Goldberg, Susan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Goldberg, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Gorman, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Gorman, Mary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Gupta, Mahendra | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 56 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 36 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain BJC Healthcare — 4 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Christian Extended Care & Rehabilitation — Saint Louis, MO · overall 5/5
- Alton Memorial Rehab & Therapy — Alton, IL · overall 4/5
- Memorial Care Center — Belleville, IL · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What are your visiting policies — can family visit any time the resident wants?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 55% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 56 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 103 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McKnight Place Extended Care | 1.8 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Monarch Springs Wellness & Rehabilitation | 2.4 mi | University City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| U-City Forest Manor | 2.4 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oak Park Care Center | 2.7 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Lutheran Convalescent Home | 3.0 mi | Webster Groves, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Normandy Nursing Center | 3.5 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Delhaven Manor | 3.7 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Johns Place | 4.7 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mary, Queen and Mother Center | 4.7 mi | Shrewsbury, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bernard Care Center | 5.0 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bentleys Extended Care | 5.2 mi | Overland, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Bethesda Dilworth | 5.3 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in St. Louis, MO — 69 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Bentwood Nursing & Rehab — Florissant, MO · overall 1/5
- Bethesda Southgate — Saint Louis, MO · overall 5/5
- Big Bend Woods Healthcare Center — Valley Park, MO · overall 1/5
- Bluebird Wellness and Rehabilitation — Saint Louis, MO · overall 1/5
- Brooking Park — Chesterfield, MO · overall 3/5
- Christian Extended Care & Rehabilitation — Saint Louis, MO · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265439.