How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
410 H Road, Sikeston, MO 63801 (opens Google Maps) · Scott County · (573) 471-7683· 70 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PARADIGM SENIOR MANAGEMENT (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. F-0699
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| May 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| May 19, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574 |
| May 19, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 19, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.04 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 24% in Missouri; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.33 | 0.49 | 0.69 | bottom 32% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.79 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 31% in Missouri; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 12% in Missouri; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.7 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 48% in Missouri; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 47.8 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.28, RN 0.35, weekend 3.01.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.28 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Daybreak Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bramlett, Candace | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Bramlett, Candace | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2025 |
| Hutchinson, Dalen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Hutchinson, Dalen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Hutchinson, Dalen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| MRV Banks | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2022 |
| MRV Banks | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2025 |
| Paradigm Rehab Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Paradigm Rehab Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2025 |
| Paradigm Senior Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Paradigm Senior Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Sahai, Madhu | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Sahai, Madhu | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Sells, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Sells, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Thornsbrough, Brock | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/19/2024 |
| Thornsbrough, Brock | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/19/2024 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Paradigm Senior Management — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bertrand Nursing and Rehab Center | 7.9 mi | Bertrand, MO | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Sikeston Convalescent Center | 8.7 mi | Sikeston, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Clearview Nursing Center | 9.0 mi | Sikeston, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hunter Acres Caring Center | 9.4 mi | Sikeston, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Delta South Nursing & Rehabilitation | 9.9 mi | Sikeston, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Annie's Garden Skilled Nursing | 10.7 mi | Sikeston, MO | —/5 | ||
| Chaffee Nursing Center | 14.8 mi | Chaffee, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aspire Senior Living East Prairie | 17.0 mi | East Prairie, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Cotton Point Living Center | 17.2 mi | Matthews, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Lutheran Home, the | 20.0 mi | Cape Girardeau, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265548.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details