How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Covenant Woods Nursing Home
7090 Covenant Woods Drive, Mechanicsville, VA 23111 (opens Google Maps) · Hanover County · (804) 569-8003· 62 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Dec 15, 2015 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 13, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint F-0658
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint F-0690
View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Apr 21, 2022 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Feb 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Feb 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Feb 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityVirginia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.00
Virginia average: 3.67
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.53
Virginia average: 0.66
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.64
Virginia average: 3.21
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.00 | 3.67 | 3.95 | top 12% in Virginia; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.69 | top 46% in Virginia; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.64 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 11% in Virginia; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 45% in Virginia; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 48.1 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 48.2 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.51, RN 0.48, weekend 4.19.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.51 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Covenant Woods Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Adams, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Armor, Brandon | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Baker Tilly Advisory Group LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/11/2024 |
| Baker Tilly Us LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/10/2024 |
| Ball, Melissa | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Beaulieu, Kelsey | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Beaulieu, Kelsey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Bowers, Roger | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Cedarfield Corporation | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/11/2024 |
| Chiles Healthcare Consulting, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Clingman, Ed | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Clingman, Ed | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Cooke, Karen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2017 |
| Cooke, Marjorie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Covenant Woods | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/05/2014 |
| Davis, Carrie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2015 |
| Davis, Carrie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2015 |
| Dhaliwal, Anju | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Floyd, Abigail | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 48 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 28 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 48 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 27 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanover Health and Rehabilitation Center | 0.1 mi | Mechanicsville, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Autumn Care of Mechanicsville | 0.6 mi | Mechanicsville, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Henrico Health & Rehabilitation Center | 5.9 mi | Highland Springs, VA | —/5 | SFF | |
| Westminster-Canterbury of Richmond | 6.6 mi | Richmond, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Vcu Health Children's Services at Brook Road | 6.9 mi | Richmond, VA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Lakeside Health & Rehabilitation | 7.1 mi | Richmond, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Rosedale Health & Rehabilitation | 7.3 mi | Richmond, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Parham Health Care & Rehab Center | 8.3 mi | Richmond, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| The Virginia Home | 9.1 mi | Richmond, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing Center | 9.3 mi | Richmond, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Elizabeth Adam Crump Health and Rehab | 10.3 mi | Glen Allen, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Forest Hill Health & Rehabilitation | 10.5 mi | Richmond, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hanover, VA — 4 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Ashland Nursing and Rehabilitation — Ashland, VA · overall 1/5abuseSFF
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495419.